Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Guideline for Influenza Testing in 4 US Emergency Departments.
Dugas, Andrea F; Hsieh, Yu-Hsiang; LoVecchio, Frank; Moran, Gregory J; Steele, Mark T; Talan, David A; Rothman, Richard E.
Afiliación
  • Dugas AF; Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Hsieh YH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • LoVecchio F; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix.
  • Moran GJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Olive View-UCLA Medical Center.
  • Steele MT; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine/Truman Medical Center.
  • Talan DA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Olive View-UCLA Medical Center.
  • Rothman RE; Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clin Infect Dis ; 70(1): 49-58, 2020 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30843056
BACKGROUND: An accurate diagnosis of influenza is essential for appropriate antiviral treatment, in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. However, no clear guidance exists on which patients should be tested. We sought to develop a clinical decision guideline (CDG) to inform influenza testing decisions for those adult emergency department (ED) patients deemed appropriate for antiviral treatment by CDC guidelines. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at 4 US EDs. From November 2013 to April 2014, we enrolled adult ED patients with fever or respiratory symptoms who met criteria for antiviral treatment, per 2013 CDC guidelines. All patients were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction. Data were randomly split into derivation (80%) and validation (20%) data sets. A discrete set of independent variables was selected by logistic regression, using the derivation set to create a scoring system, with a target sensitivity of at least 90%. The derived CDG was then validated. RESULTS: Of 1941 enrolled participants, 183 (9.4%) had influenza. The derived CDG included new or increased cough (2 points), headache (1 point), subjective fever (1 point), and triage temperature >100.4°C (1 point), with a score of ≥3 indicating influenza testing was warranted. The CDG had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.1% and 36.6%, respectively, in the derivation set and of 91.5% and 34.6%, respectively, in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: A CDG with high sensitivity was derived and validated. Incorporation into practice could standardize testing for high-risk patients in adult EDs during influenza seasons, potentially improving diagnoses and treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01947049.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Gripe Humana Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Gripe Humana Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article