Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Next-Generation Sequencing of Tissue and Circulating Tumor DNA: The UC San Diego Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy Experience with Breast Malignancies.
Shatsky, Rebecca; Parker, Barbara A; Bui, Nam Q; Helsten, Teresa; Schwab, Richard B; Boles, Sarah G; Kurzrock, Razelle.
Afiliación
  • Shatsky R; University of California, San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California. rshatsky@ucsd.edu.
  • Parker BA; University of California, San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
  • Bui NQ; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Helsten T; University of California, San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
  • Schwab RB; University of California, San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
  • Boles SG; University of California, San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
  • Kurzrock R; University of California, San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
Mol Cancer Ther ; 18(5): 1001-1011, 2019 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30926636
ABSTRACT
Clinical-grade next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tissue- and blood-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allows assessment of multiple genomic alterations in patients with cancer. We analyzed ctDNA (54-70 genes) in 62 patients with advanced breast cancer (median = five prior therapies); 38 also had tissue NGS (236-315 genes). Overall, 42 of 62 patients (68%) had detectable (characterized) ctDNA alterations (variants of unknown significance excluded), and 37 of 38 (97%) had tissue alterations. The median (range) number of characterized alterations in ctDNA was 1 (0-7), and in tissue, 4 (0-17). The most common alterations in ctDNA were in TP53 (37% of patients) and PIK3CA (23%), and for tissue, TP53 (37%) and PIK3CA (24%); EGFR amplification was seen in ctDNA (11%), but not in tissue. Concordance between ctDNA and tissue appeared higher if <6 months separated the sample acquisition, although small sample size precluded statistical validation. Overall, 32 of 67 tissue alterations (48%) were also detected in ctDNA; 35 of 72 ctDNA alterations (48%) were also in tissue. Excluding estrogen receptor and ERBB2, 41 of 62 patients (66%) had potentially actionable alterations in ctDNA, and 36 of 38 (95%), in tissue (with potential actionability based on either preclinical or clinical evidence). If ≥1 genomic alteration had ctDNA ≥5%, survival was shorter than if ctDNA was <5% (median, 6.7 vs. 17.9 months; P = 0.01). In conclusion, tissue and ctDNA NGS reveal potentially actionable alterations in most patients. The genomic results of ctDNA and tissue NGS overlap, but there are differences, perhaps reflecting temporal spacing and tumor heterogeneity. ctDNA quantification also provides prognostic information.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Genoma Humano / Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento / ADN Tumoral Circulante Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Mol Cancer Ther Asunto de la revista: ANTINEOPLASICOS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Genoma Humano / Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento / ADN Tumoral Circulante Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Mol Cancer Ther Asunto de la revista: ANTINEOPLASICOS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article