Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are we restoring functional fens? - The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits.
Klimkowska, Agata; Goldstein, Klara; Wyszomirski, Tomasz; Kozub, Lukasz; Wilk, Mateusz; Aggenbach, Camiel; Bakker, Jan P; Belting, Heinrich; Beltman, Boudewijn; Blüml, Volker; De Vries, Yzaak; Geiger-Udod, Beate; Grootjans, Ab P; Hedberg, Petter; Jager, Henk J; Kerkhof, Dick; Kollmann, Johannes; Pawlikowski, Pawel; Pleyl, Elisabeth; Reinink, Warner; Rydin, Hakan; Schrautzer, Joachim; Sliva, Jan; Stanko, Robert; Sundberg, Sebastian; Timmermann, Tiemo; Wolejko, Leslaw; van der Burg, Rob F; van der Hoek, Dick; van Diggelen, Jose M H; van Heerden, Adrie; van Tweel, Loekie; Vegelin, Kees; Kotowski, Wiktor.
Afiliación
  • Klimkowska A; Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Goldstein K; Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Wyszomirski T; Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Kozub L; Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Wilk M; Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Aggenbach C; Ecosystem Management Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Bakker JP; The Community and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Belting H; Staatliche Vogelschutzwarte-Naturschutzstation Dümmer-Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft, Küsten- und Naturschutz Am Ochsenmoor, Ochsenmoor, Germany.
  • Beltman B; Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Blüml V; BMS-Umweltplanung, Osnabrück, Germany in association with University of Bremen, Germany.
  • De Vries Y; The Community and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Geiger-Udod B; Natura 2000 Team, Regierung von Oberbayern, München, Germany.
  • Grootjans AP; The Community and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Hedberg P; Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Jager HJ; It Fryske Gea (Frysian Landscape), Olterterp, the Nederlands.
  • Kerkhof D; Zuid-Hollands Landschap, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Kollmann J; Department of Ecology and Ecosystem management, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
  • Pawlikowski P; Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Pleyl E; Zentrum für Umwelt und Kultur Benediktbeuern (ZUK), Gebietsbetreuerin Isar-Loisach-Moore, Benediktbeuern, Germany.
  • Reinink W; Zuid-Hollands Landschap, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Rydin H; Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Schrautzer J; Institute for Ecosystem Research, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Sliva J; Department of Ecology and Ecosystem management, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
  • Stanko R; Klub Przyrodników, Swiebodzin, Poland.
  • Sundberg S; Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Timmermann T; Landscape Ecology and Ecosystem Dynamics, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Wolejko L; Department of Botany, Institute of Botany and Nature Conservation, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland.
  • van der Burg RF; Coöperatie Bosgroep Zuid Nederland, Heeze & Floristische Werkgroep KNNV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • van der Hoek D; Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • van Diggelen JMH; B-WARE B.V. Research Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Heerden A; Province Zuid-Holland, The Hague, the Netherlands.
  • van Tweel L; Landschap Overijssel, Dalfsen, the Netherlands.
  • Vegelin K; BNL-Vegelin, Murchin, Germany.
  • Kotowski W; Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0215645, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31017976
ABSTRACT
In peatland restoration we often lack an information whether re-established ecosystems are functionally similar to non-degraded ones. We re-analysed the long-term outcomes of restoration on vegetation and plant functional traits in 38 European fens restored by rewetting (18 sites) and topsoil removal (20 sites). We used traits related to nutrient acquisition strategies, competitiveness, seed traits, and used single- and multi-trait metrics. A separate set of vegetation records from near-natural fens with diverse plant communities was used to generate reference values to aid the comparisons. We found that both restoration methods enhanced the similarity of species composition to non-degraded systems but trait analysis revealed differences between the two approaches. Traits linked to nutrient acquisition strategies indicated that topsoil removal was more effective than rewetting. After topsoil removal competitive species in plant communities had decreased, while stress-tolerant species had increased. A substantial reduction in nutrient availability ruled out the effect of initial disturbance. An ability to survive and grow in anoxic conditions was enhanced after restoration, but the reference values were not achieved. Rewetting was more effective than topsoil removal in restricting variation in traits values permitted in re-developing vegetation. We found no indication of a shift towards reference in seed traits, which suggested that dispersal constraint and colonization deficit can be a widespread phenomena. Two functional diversity indices functional richness and functional dispersion showed response to restoration and shifted values towards reference mires and away from the degraded systems. We concluded that targeting only one type of environmental stressor does not lead to a recovery of fens, as it provides insufficient level of stress to restore a functional ecosystem. In general, restoration efforts do not ensure the re-establishment and long-term persistence of fens. Restoration efforts result in recovery of fen ecosystems, confirmed with our functional trait analysis, although more rigid actions are needed for restoring fully functional mires, by achieving high and constant levels of anoxia and nutrient stresses.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fenómenos Fisiológicos de las Plantas / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Humedales País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fenómenos Fisiológicos de las Plantas / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Humedales País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia