Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Including health impacts in environmental impact assessments for three Australian coal-mining projects: a documentary analysis.
Riley, Emily; Sainsbury, Peter; McManus, Phil; Colagiuri, Ruth; Viliani, Francesca; Dawson, Angus; Duncan, Elizabeth; Stone, Yolande; Pham, Tracy; Harris, Patrick.
Afiliación
  • Riley E; Level 2 The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre D17, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
  • Sainsbury P; School of Public Health, The University of Sydney.
  • McManus P; School of Geosciences, University of Sydney.
  • Colagiuri R; Level 2 The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre D17, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
  • Viliani F; International SOS, Denmark Office, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Dawson A; Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building K25, NSW 2006, Australia.
  • Duncan E; School of Geosciences, University of Sydney.
  • Stone Y; Stonecorp Pty Ltd, Mosman 2088, Australia.
  • Pham T; Level 2 The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre D17, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
  • Harris P; Level 2 The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre D17, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Health Promot Int ; 35(3): 449-457, 2020 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31056656
ABSTRACT
Notwithstanding the historical benefits of coal in aiding human and economic development, the negative health and environmental impacts of coal extraction and processing are of increasing concern. Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are a regulated policy mechanism that can be used to predict and consider the health impacts of mining projects to determine if consent is given. The ways in which health is considered within EIA is unclear. This research investigated 'How and to what extent are health, well-being and equity issues considered in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) of major coal mining projects in New South Wales, Australia'. To this end we developed and applied a comprehensive coding framework designed to interrogate the publicly available environmental impact statements (EISs) of three mines in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, for their inclusion of health, well-being and equity issues. Analysis of the three EISs demonstrates that the possible impacts of each mine on health and well-being were narrowly and inadequately considered; when health and well-being were considered there was a failure to assess the possible impacts specific to the particular mine and the communities potentially affected; the cumulative impacts on human health of multiple mines in the same geographical area were almost completely ignored; the discussions of intragenerational and intergenerational equity did not demonstrate a sound understanding of equity and, it is essential that governments' requirements for the EIA include detailed analysis of the health, well-being, equity and cumulative impacts specific to the proposed mine and relevant communities.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Minas de Carbón / Equidad en Salud / Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Health Promot Int Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Minas de Carbón / Equidad en Salud / Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Health Promot Int Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia