Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Motives and Side-Effects of Microdosing With Psychedelics Among Users.
Hutten, Nadia R P W; Mason, Natasha L; Dolder, Patrick C; Kuypers, Kim P C.
Afiliación
  • Hutten NRPW; Department of Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
  • Mason NL; Department of Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
  • Dolder PC; Department of Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
  • Kuypers KPC; Department of Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ; 22(7): 426-434, 2019 07 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152167
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Microdosing with psychedelics has gained considerable media attention where it is portrayed as a performance enhancer, especially popular on the work floor. While reports are in general positive, scientific evidence about potential negative effects is lacking aside from the prevalence and motives for use. The present study addressed this gap by surveying psychedelic users about their experience with microdosing including their dosing schedule, motivation, and potential experienced negative effects.

METHODS:

An online questionnaire was launched on several websites and fora between March and July 2018. Respondents who had consented, were 18 years of age or older, and had experience with microdosing were included in the analyses.

RESULTS:

In total, 1116 of the respondents were either currently microdosing (79.5%) or microdosed in the past (20.5%). Lysergic acid diethylamide (10 mcg) and psilocybin (0.5 g) were the most commonly used psychedelics with a microdosing frequency between 2 and 4 times per week. The majority of users, however, were oblivious about the consumed dose. Performance enhancement was the main motive to microdose (37%). The most reported negative effects were of psychological nature and occurred acutely while under the influence.

CONCLUSION:

In line with media reports and anecdotes, the majority of our respondents microdosed to enhance performance. Negative effects occurred mostly acutely after substance consumption. However, the main reason to have stopped microdosing was that it was not effective. Future experimental placebo-controlled studies are needed to test whether performance enhancement can be quantified and to assess potential negative effects after longer term microdosing.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias / Sustancias para Mejorar el Rendimiento / Alucinógenos / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFARMACOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias / Sustancias para Mejorar el Rendimiento / Alucinógenos / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFARMACOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos