Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation Dose in Prostatic Artery Embolization Using Cone-Beam CT and 3D Roadmap Software.
Schott, Peter; Katoh, Marcus; Fischer, Nicolas; Freyhardt, Patrick.
Afiliación
  • Schott P; Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany. Electronic address: peter.schott@helios-gesundheit.de.
  • Katoh M; Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany.
  • Fischer N; Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany.
  • Freyhardt P; Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(9): 1452-1458, 2019 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31371137
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the radiation dose in patients undergoing prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using cone-beam CT and 3-dimensional (3D) guidance software. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this single-center retrospective study, 100 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (mean prostate volume, 83.6 mL ± 44.2; 69.4 ± 9.6 years of age; body mass index, 26.5 ± 4.2) were treated using PAE between October 2016 and April 2018. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. All patients received at least 1 intraprocedural cone-beam CT per side for evaluation of the vessel anatomy and software rendering of 3D guidance for catheter guidance. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in the distal branches only. The total dose area product (DAP), along with the DAP attributed to fluoroscopy, DSA, and cone-beam CT, were assessed.

RESULTS:

Bilateral embolization was achieved in 83 patients (83%). The average total DAP was 134.4 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 69.5 (range, 44.7-410.9 Gy ⋅ cm2). Fluoroscopy, DSA, and cone-beam CT accounted for 35.5 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 21.3 (range, 8.6-148.6 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 26.4% (percentage of total DAP), 58.2 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 48.3 (range, 10.3-309.3 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 43.3%, and 40.7 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 14.5 (range, 15.9-86.3 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 30.3%, respectively. Average procedure time was 89.4 ± 27.0 minutes, and the average fluoroscopy time was 30.9 ± 12.2 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Intraprocedural cone-beam CT in combination with 3D guidance software allows for identification and catheterization of the prostatic artery in PAE. Furthermore, the results of this trial indicate that this study protocol may lead to a low overall radiation dose.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arterias / Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Dosis de Radiación / Programas Informáticos / Radiografía Intervencional / Imagenología Tridimensional / Embolización Terapéutica / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arterias / Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Dosis de Radiación / Programas Informáticos / Radiografía Intervencional / Imagenología Tridimensional / Embolización Terapéutica / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article