Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeating Measurement of Bone Mineral Density when Monitoring with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: 2019 ISCD Official Position.
Kendler, David L; Compston, Juliet; Carey, John J; Wu, Chih-Hsing; Ibrahim, Ammar; Lewiecki, E Michael.
Afiliación
  • Kendler DL; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Electronic address: davidkendler@gmail.com.
  • Compston J; Department of Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Carey JJ; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Wu CH; Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Ibrahim A; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
  • Lewiecki EM; New Mexico Clinical Research and Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
J Clin Densitom ; 22(4): 489-500, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31378452
ABSTRACT
Bone mineral density (BMD) can be measured at multiple skeletal sites using various technologies to aid clinical decision-making in bone and mineral disorders. BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has a critical role in predicting risk of fracture, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and monitoring patients. In clinical practice, DXA remains the most available and best validated tool for monitoring patients. A quality baseline DXA scan is essential for comparison with all subsequent scans. Monitoring patients with serial measurements requires technical expertise and knowledge of the least significant change in order to determine when follow-up scans should be repeated. Prior ISCD Official Positions have clarified how and when repeat DXA is useful as well as the interpretation of results. The 2019 ISCD Official Positions considered new evidence and clarifies if and when BMD should be repeated. There is good evidence showing that repeat BMD measurement can identify people who experience bone loss, which is an independent predictor of fracture risk. There is good evidence showing that the reduction in spine and hip fractures with osteoporosis medication is proportional to the change in BMD with treatment. There is evidence that measuring BMD is useful following discontinuation of osteoporosis treatment. There is less documentation addressing the effectiveness of monitoring BMD to improve medication adherence, whether monitoring of BMD reduces the risk of fracture, or effectively discriminates patients who should and should not recommence treatment following an interruption of medication. Further research is needed in all of these areas.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Sociedades Médicas / Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto / Absorciometría de Fotón / Densidad Ósea Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Densitom Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Sociedades Médicas / Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto / Absorciometría de Fotón / Densidad Ósea Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Densitom Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article