Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive immunization program serving high-risk, uninsured adults.
Wilson, Kimberly J; Brown, H Shelton; Patel, Ujas; Tucker, Debbie; Becker, Kurt.
Afiliación
  • Wilson KJ; University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, 1616 Guadalupe, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX 78701, United States of America. Electronic address: Kimberly.j.wilson@uth.tmc.edu.
  • Brown HS; University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, 1616 Guadalupe, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX 78701, United States of America. Electronic address: henry.s.brown@uth.tmc.edu.
  • Patel U; University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, 1616 Guadalupe, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX 78701, United States of America.
  • Tucker D; Austin Public Health, 15 Waller Street, Austin, TX 78701, United States of America. Electronic address: debbie.tucker@austintexas.gov.
  • Becker K; Austin Public Health, 15 Waller Street, Austin, TX 78701, United States of America. Electronic address: kurt.becker@austintexas.gov.
Prev Med ; 130: 105860, 2020 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31678176
ABSTRACT
Despite the numerous social and economic benefits of vaccination, adult immunization rates fall far short of recommended levels costing the United States $9 billion annually in health care expenditures and reduced productivity. While it is well recognized that childhood immunization is highly cost-effective, the economic impact of adult immunization programs varies by disease and is influenced by population demographics. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive adult immunization program serving high-need populations delivered by a local health department (LHD) in partnership with community organizations. We modeled incremental cost-effectiveness taking the payer perspective of each vaccine separately in simulated cohorts of 100,000 over a 20-year horizon using data provided by the LHD and data from the published literature. We adjusted the results to align with actual program delivery and used them to estimate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the entire program. We assessed the effects of varying our base model parameters in univariate sensitivity analyses. We discounted benefits and life years saved (LYS) at 3% and adjusted results to 2016 US$. Four of seven disease models were cost-effective (using a $100,000 CE threshold) with ICERS ranging from $14,260 to $79,022/LYS. Sensitivity analyses did not substantially impact the results. The ICER for program as a whole was $67,940/LYS. A community-delivered comprehensive immunization program serving uninsured, low income, high-risk adults is a cost-effective investment even when most do not receive the full regimen of some vaccines.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles / Vacunación / Pacientes no Asegurados / Programas de Inmunización Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles / Vacunación / Pacientes no Asegurados / Programas de Inmunización Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article