Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Antibiotic Beads in Lower Extremity Salvage.
Burtt, Karen E; Badash, Ido; Leland, Hyuma A; Gould, Daniel J; Rounds, Alexis D; Patel, Ketan M; Carey, Joseph N.
Afiliación
  • Burtt KE; Department of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida. Electronic address: burtt@usc.edu.
  • Badash I; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
  • Leland HA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Gould DJ; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
  • Rounds AD; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
  • Patel KM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
  • Carey JN; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
J Surg Res ; 247: 499-507, 2020 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690532
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Antibiotic beads and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) represent two methods of wound management used during staged debridement in the post-trauma limb salvage pathway. The efficacy of NPWT and antibiotic beads in preventing infection remains unclear.

METHODS:

This study is a retrospective review of patients with traumatic lower extremity open fractures who received NPWT and/or antibiotic beads before soft tissue reconstruction at an urban level 1 trauma center between August 2007 and December 2015. Patients with wound infections before application of NPWT and/or antibiotic beads were excluded.

RESULTS:

In 73 lower extremities requiring soft tissue coverage, 46 received antibiotic beads and 48 received NPWT. Overall infection rate was 15.1%. Use of antibiotic beads was associated with a decreased risk of infection (6.4% versus 30.7%; P = 0.01). Use of NPWT was associated with an increased risk of one or more complications (45.7% versus 4.2%; P = 0.001). The development of infection was associated with a greater period of time between application of antibiotic beads (22 ± 13 versus 12 ± 6 d, P = 0.01) or NPWT (23 ± 15 versus 10 ± 11 d, P = 0.004) and soft tissue coverage. Overall limb salvage rate was 95.9%; secondary amputation was associated with development of infection (P = 0.001) but not with use of NPWT or antibiotic beads.

CONCLUSIONS:

Antibiotic beads may prevent infections in patients awaiting soft tissue coverage of wounds. NPWT may contribute to a greater rate of complication. Limb salvage was successful in most cases regardless of method of wound management.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica / Recuperación del Miembro / Extremidad Inferior / Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas / Fracturas Abiertas / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica / Recuperación del Miembro / Extremidad Inferior / Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas / Fracturas Abiertas / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article