Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Review of Clinical Data on Salvage Therapy in Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Reddy, Rajiv D; Moheimani, Roya; Yu, Gregory G; Chakravarthy, Krishnan V.
Afiliación
  • Reddy RD; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Moheimani R; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VA Greater LA Health Care System/UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Yu GG; Georgetown University Hospital/Washington Hospital Center Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Chakravarthy KV; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Neuromodulation ; 23(5): 562-571, 2020 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31697457
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Since its introduction in 1967, neuromodulation through spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGs) has advanced significantly in both the technology and indications for use. There are now over 14,000 SCS implants performed worldwide every year. This review focuses on mechanisms behind the loss of efficacy in neuromodulation and current data on salvage therapy, defined as the conversion of a neuromodulation device to an alternative SCS or DRG stimulation, in the event of loss of efficacy or failure of a trial. STUDY

DESIGN:

A narrative review of clinical studies regarding habituation, explant data, and salvage therapy with SCS.

METHODS:

Available literature was reviewed on spinal cord stimulation technology and salvage therapy. Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, SCOPUS, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The primary outcome measures were to understand the mechanisms of loss of efficacy, provide a review of explants due to failure in treatment, and summarize the data on current salvage therapy in SCS.

RESULTS:

A total of eight studies and four abstracts/poster presentations were identified and reviewed. Of the eight studies, only one was a randomized controlled trial.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is limited evidence for the appropriate treatment alternatives, but from data currently available the conversion from conventional tonic stimulation to burst, high frequency (10 kHz), multiple wave forms, and/or DRGs may be appropriate in select patients and will require further research to determine the most appropriate first line salvage in the context of the underlying pain pathology.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia Recuperativa / Dolor Crónico / Estimulación de la Médula Espinal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia Recuperativa / Dolor Crónico / Estimulación de la Médula Espinal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos