Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study.
McNair, Angus G K; Whistance, Robert N; Main, Barry; Forsythe, Rachael; Macefield, Rhiannon; Rees, Jonathan; Pullyblank, Anne; Avery, Kerry; Brookes, Sara; Thomas, Michael G; Sylvester, Paul A; Russell, Ann; Oliver, Alfred; Morton, Dion; Kennedy, Robin; Jayne, David; Huxtable, Richard; Hackett, Roland; Dutton, Susan; Coleman, Mark G; Card, Mia; Brown, Julia; Blazeby, Jane.
Afiliación
  • McNair AGK; Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK angus.mcnair@bristol.ac.uk.
  • Whistance RN; GI Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Main B; Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Forsythe R; Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Macefield R; Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Rees J; Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Pullyblank A; Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Avery K; Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Brookes S; GI Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Thomas MG; West of England Academic Health Science Network, Bristol, UK.
  • Sylvester PA; Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Russell A; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Oliver A; Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Morton D; Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Kennedy R; Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Jayne D; Consumer Liaison Group, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK.
  • Huxtable R; Consumer Liaison Group, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK.
  • Hackett R; Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Dutton S; Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
  • Coleman MG; Department of Academic Surgery, Leeds Institute of Biological and Clinical Sciences, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
  • Card M; Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Brown J; Colorectal Site Specific Group, South West Cancer Network, Bristol, UK.
  • Blazeby J; CSM, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open ; 9(11): e028623, 2019 11 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31727644
OBJECTIVE: 'Core information sets' (CISs) represent baseline information, agreed by patients and professionals, to stimulate individualised patient-centred discussions. This study developed a CIS for use before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. DESIGN: Three phase consensus study: (1) Systematic literature reviews and patient interviews to identify potential information of importance to patients, (2) UK national Delphi survey of patients and professionals to rate the importance of the information, (3) international consensus meeting to agree on the final CIS. SETTING: UK CRC centres. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sampling was conducted to ensure CRC centre representation based upon geographical region and caseload volume. Responses were received from 63/81 (78%) centres (90 professionals). Adult patients who had undergone CRC surgery were eligible, and purposive sampling was conducted to ensure representation based on age, sex and cancer location (rectum, left and right colon). Responses were received from 97/267 (35%) patients with a wide age range (29-87), equal sex ratio and cancer location. Attendees of the international Tripartite Colorectal Conference were eligible for the consensus meeting. OUTCOMES: Phase 1: Information of potential importance to patients was extracted verbatim and operationalised into a Delphi questionnaire. Phase 2: Patients and professionals rated the importance information on a 9-point Likert scale, and resurveyed following group feedback. Information rated of low importance were discarded using predefined criteria. Phase 3: A modified nominal group technique was used to gain final consensus in separate consensus meetings with patients and professionals. RESULTS: Data sources identified 1216 pieces of information that informed a 98-item questionnaire. Analysis led to 50 and 23 information domains being retained after the first and second surveys, respectively. The final CIS included 11 concepts including specific surgical complications, short and long-term survival, disease recurrence, stoma and quality of life issues. CONCLUSIONS: This study has established a CIS for professionals to discuss with patients before CRC surgery.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Educación del Paciente como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Educación del Paciente como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article