Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms on Automatic Pulmonary Nodule Detection and Classification Tested on Different Datasets That Are Not Derived from LIDC-IDRI: A Systematic Review.
Li, Dana; Mikela Vilmun, Bolette; Frederik Carlsen, Jonathan; Albrecht-Beste, Elisabeth; Ammitzbøl Lauridsen, Carsten; Bachmann Nielsen, Michael; Lindskov Hansen, Kristoffer.
Afiliación
  • Li D; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Mikela Vilmun B; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Frederik Carlsen J; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Albrecht-Beste E; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Ammitzbøl Lauridsen C; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Bachmann Nielsen M; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lindskov Hansen K; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 9(4)2019 Nov 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31795409
The aim of this study was to systematically review the performance of deep learning technology in detecting and classifying pulmonary nodules on computed tomography (CT) scans that were not from the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC-IDRI) database. Furthermore, we explored the difference in performance when the deep learning technology was applied to test datasets different from the training datasets. Only peer-reviewed, original research articles utilizing deep learning technology were included in this study, and only results from testing on datasets other than the LIDC-IDRI were included. We searched a total of six databases: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), Scopus, and Web of Science. This resulted in 1782 studies after duplicates were removed, and a total of 26 studies were included in this systematic review. Three studies explored the performance of pulmonary nodule detection only, 16 studies explored the performance of pulmonary nodule classification only, and 7 studies had reports of both pulmonary nodule detection and classification. Three different deep learning architectures were mentioned amongst the included studies: convolutional neural network (CNN), massive training artificial neural network (MTANN), and deep stacked denoising autoencoder extreme learning machine (SDAE-ELM). The studies reached a classification accuracy between 68-99.6% and a detection accuracy between 80.6-94%. Performance of deep learning technology in studies using different test and training datasets was comparable to studies using same type of test and training datasets. In conclusion, deep learning was able to achieve high levels of accuracy, sensitivity, and/or specificity in detecting and/or classifying nodules when applied to pulmonary CT scans not from the LIDC-IDRI database.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca