Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging.
Meier, Joseph G; Erasmus, Jeremy J; Gladish, Gregory W; Peterson, Christine B; Diab, Radwan H; Mawlawi, Osama R.
Afiliación
  • Meier JG; Department of Imaging Physics - Unit 1352, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Erasmus JJ; MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Science Center at Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gladish GW; Thoracic Imaging Department - Unit 1478, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Peterson CB; Thoracic Imaging Department - Unit 1478, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Diab RH; Biostatistics Department - Unit 1411, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Mawlawi OR; Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(1): 158-165, 2020 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31816183
ABSTRACT
Continuous bed motion (CBM) was recently introduced as an alternative to step-and-shoot (SS) mode for PET/CT data acquisition. In CBM, the patient is continuously advanced into the scanner at a preset speed, whereas in SS, the patient is imaged in overlapping bed positions. Previous investigations have shown that patients preferred CBM over SS for PET data acquisition. In this study, we investigated the effect of CBM versus SS on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction. One hundred patients referred for PET/CT were scanned using a Siemens mCT scanner. Patient respiratory waveforms were recorded using an Anzai system and analyzed using four

methods:

Methods 1 and 2 measured the coefficient of variation (COV) of the respiratory cycle duration (RCD) and amplitude (RCA). Method 3 measured the respiratory frequency signal prominence (RSP) and method 4 measured the width of the HDChest optimal gate (OG) window when using a 35% duty cycle. Waveform analysis was performed over the abdominothoracic region which exhibited the greatest respiratory motion and the results were compared between CBM and SS. Respiratory motion correction was assessed by comparing the ratios of SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR of focal FDG uptake, as well as Radiologists' visual assessment of corresponding image quality of motion corrected and uncorrected images for both acquisition modes. The respiratory waveforms analysis showed that the RCD and RCA COV were 3.7% and 33.3% lower for CBM compared to SS, respectively, while the RSP and OG were 30.5% and 2.0% higher, respectively. Image analysis on the other hand showed that SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR were 8.5%, 4.5%, and 3.4% higher for SS compared to CBM, respectively, while the Radiologists' visual comparison showed similar image quality between acquisition modes. However, none of the results showed statistically significant differences between SS and CBM, suggesting that motion correction is not impacted by acquisition mode.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Respiración / Técnicas de Imagen Sincronizada Respiratorias / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones / Movimiento / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Respiración / Técnicas de Imagen Sincronizada Respiratorias / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones / Movimiento / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos