Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Increasing Quit Attempts by Transitioning to Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes Versus Reducing Number of Cigarettes Per Day: A Secondary Analysis of an Exploratory Randomized Trial.
Klemperer, Elias M; Hughes, John R; Callas, Peter W.
Afiliación
  • Klemperer EM; Department of Psychiatry, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT.
  • Hughes JR; Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
  • Callas PW; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 21(Suppl 1): S81-S87, 2019 12 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31867643
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed reducing nicotine with very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes. In contrast, reducing nicotine by reducing number of cigarettes per day (CPD) is common. Our prior findings demonstrate that VLNC cigarettes decreased dependence more and were more acceptable than reducing CPD. This secondary analysis explored which reduction strategy increased quit attempts (QA), self-efficacy, or intention to quit more.

METHODS:

This is a secondary analysis of 68 adult daily smokers not ready to quit randomized to smoke VLNC cigarettes versus reduce CPD over 5 weeks. All participants smoked study cigarettes with nicotine yield similar to most commercial cigarettes ad lib for 1 week (baseline). Participants were then randomized to gradually reduce to 70%, 35%, 15%, and 3% of baseline nicotine over 4 weeks by either (1) transitioning to lower nicotine VLNC cigarettes or (2) reducing the number of full nicotine CPD. All participants received nicotine patches to aid reduction. We assessed (1) QAs using nightly and weekly self-reports, (2) Velicer's Self-Efficacy to Quit measure weekly, and (3) the Intention-to-Quit Ladder nightly.

RESULTS:

More CPD (41%) than VLNC (17%) participants made any QA (odds ratio = 3.4, 95% confidence interval = 1.1, 10.5). There was no difference in QAs ≥24 h. Self-efficacy increased for VLNC but not CPD participants (interaction F = 3.7, p < .01). The condition by time interaction for intention-to-quit was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Reducing number of CPD increased QAs more than reducing nicotine via switching to VLNC cigarettes. The lack of difference in longer QAs suggests replication tests are needed. IMPLICATIONS Reducing the frequency of smoking behavior (ie, CPD) could be a more effective strategy to increase QAs than reducing the magnitude of nicotine in each cigarette (ie, VLNC) per se.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fumar / Cese del Hábito de Fumar / Nicotina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fumar / Cese del Hábito de Fumar / Nicotina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article