Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validity of self-reported and objectively measured sedentary behavior in pregnancy.
Barone Gibbs, Bethany; Paley, Joshua L; Jones, Melissa A; Whitaker, Kara M; Connolly, Christopher P; Catov, Janet M.
Afiliación
  • Barone Gibbs B; Department of Health and Physical Activity, Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 32 Oak Hill Court, Room 220, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. bbarone@pitt.edu.
  • Paley JL; Department of Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. bbarone@pitt.edu.
  • Jones MA; Department of Health and Physical Activity, Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 32 Oak Hill Court, Room 220, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
  • Whitaker KM; Department of Health and Physical Activity, Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 32 Oak Hill Court, Room 220, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
  • Connolly CP; Department of Health and Human Physiology, Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
  • Catov JM; Department of Educational Leadership, Sport Studies, and Educational/Counseling Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 99, 2020 Feb 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32046663
BACKGROUND: Sedentary behavior (SED) is a potential risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes. We evaluated the validity of several common and one new method to assess SED across three trimesters of pregnancy. METHODS: This cohort study of pregnant women measured objective and self-reported SED each trimester via thigh-worn activPAL3 micro (criterion), waist-worn Actigraph GT3X, and self-report from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) and the de novo Sedentary Behavior Two Domain Questionnaire (SB2D). SED (hours per day) and percent time in SED (SED%) from activPAL were compared to GT3X, SB2D, and PPAQ using Pearson's r, ICC, Bland-Altman analysis, and comparison of criterion SED and SED% across tertiles of alternative methods. RESULTS: Fifty-eight women (mean age 31.5 ± 4.8 years; pre-pregnancy BMI 25.1 ± 5.6 kg/m2; 76% white) provided three trimesters of valid activPAL data. Compared to activPAL, GT3X had agreement ranging from r = 0.54-0.66 and ICC = 0.52-0.65. Bland-Altman plots revealed small mean differences and unpatterned errors, but wide limits of agreement (greater than ±2 h and ± 15%). The SB2D and PPAQ had r < 0.5 and ICC < 0.3 vs. activPAL SED, with lower agreement during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters, and performed poorly in Bland-Altman analyses. SED% from the modified SB2D performed best of the self-reported instruments with modest mean differences, r ranging from 0.55 to 0.60, and ICCs from 0.31-0.33; though, limits of agreement were greater than ±35%. Significant trends in activPAL SED were observed across increasing tertiles of SB2D SED in the 1st and 3rd trimesters (both p ≤ 0.001), but not the 2nd trimester (p = 0.425); and for PPAQ SED in the 1st and 2nd trimesters (both p < 0.05), but not the 3rd trimester (p = 0.158). AcitvPAL SED and SED% increased significantly across tertiles of GT3X SED and SED% as well as SB2D SED% (all p-for-trend ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to activPAL, waist-worn GT3X produced moderate agreement, though similar mean estimates of SED across pregnancy. Self-report questionnaires had large absolute error and wide limits of agreement for SED hr./day; SB2D measurement of SED% was the best self-report method. These data suggest activPAL be used to measure SED when possible, followed by GT3X, and - when necessary - SB2D assessing SED% in pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03084302 on 3/20/2017.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / Mujeres Embarazadas / Actigrafía / Conducta Sedentaria / Autoinforme Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / Mujeres Embarazadas / Actigrafía / Conducta Sedentaria / Autoinforme Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos