Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A computerized resolution visual acuity test in preschool and school age children.
Qin, Ying-Yan; Liu, Zhen-Zhen; Zhu, Li-Yuan; Bao, Xuan; Luo, Fu-Rong; Liu, Yi-Zhi; Tsau, Young; Wu, Ming-Xing.
Afiliación
  • Qin YY; State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Liu ZZ; State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Zhu LY; State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Bao X; State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Luo FR; State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Liu YZ; State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Tsau Y; Dimetek Digital Medical Technologies, Limited, Shenzhen 518052, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Wu MX; State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Int J Ophthalmol ; 13(2): 284-291, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32090039
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To develop a novel approach called the Autoacuity Tester, and to evaluate its validity, especially the sensitivity and specificity for detecting amblyopia.

METHODS:

Children aged from 3 to 12y (n=552) were enrolled in the study. The validity of the Autoacuity Tester was evaluated by comparing it to the Tumbling E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) acuity chart for school age children, and Lea Symbols and Teller acuity card (TAC) for preschool children. The repeatability was assessed by coefficient of repeatability (COR). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting amblyopia were calculated.

RESULTS:

The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between the Autoacuity Tester and the ETDRS tests were -0.03 (-0.24, 0.19) logMAR for the school age group. In preschool children, the mean difference was 0.04 (-0.14, 0.21) logMAR between the Autoacuity Tester and the TAC and 0.00 (-0.17, 0.18) logMAR between the Autoacuity Tester and the Lea Symbols. For the school age group, the COR was 0.20 logMAR for the Autoacuity Tester and 0.18 logMAR for the ETDRS. For the preschool group, the COR was 0.13 logMAR for the Autoacuity Tester and 0.21 logMAR for TAC. The Autoacuity Tester (88%) is more sensitive than TAC (72%) in detecting amblyopia (P=0.04), while had similar specificity (92% vs 90%, P=0.20).

CONCLUSION:

The Autoacuity Tester provides a reliable alternative for assessing visual acuity, and offers advantage of higher testability and repeatability for preschool children.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Ophthalmol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Ophthalmol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China