Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer.
Jung, Sang Hoon; Kim, Jinsung; Chung, Yoonsun; Keserci, Bilgin; Pyo, Hongryull; Park, Hee Chul; Park, Won.
Afiliación
  • Jung SH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Chung Y; Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Keserci B; Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Pyo H; Department of Radiology, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Park HC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Radiat Oncol J ; 38(1): 52-59, 2020 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229809
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the feasibilities of magnetic resonance (MR) image-based planning using synthetic computed tomography (sCT) versus CT (pCT)-based planning in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed in 16 patients with prostate cancer who had been treated with helical tomotherapy. MR images were acquired using a dedicated therapy sequence; sCT images were generated using magnetic resonance for calculating attenuation (MRCAT). The three-dimensional dose distribution according to sCT was recalculated using a previously optimized plan and was compared with the doses calculated using pCT. RESULTS: The mean planning target volume doses calculated by sCT and pCT differed by 0.65% ± 1.11% (p = 0.03). Three-dimensional gamma analysis at a 2%/2 mm dose difference/distance to agreement yielded a pass rate of 0.976 (range, 0.658 to 0.986). CONCLUSION: The dose distribution results obtained using tomotherapy from MR-only simulations were in good agreement with the dose distribution results from simulation CT, with mean dose differences of less than 1% for target volume and normal organs in patients with prostate cancer.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article