Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnitude and direction of stream-forest community interactions change with timescale.
Marcarelli, Amy M; Baxter, Colden V; Benjamin, Joseph R; Miyake, Yo; Murakami, Masashi; Fausch, Kurt D; Nakano, Shigeru.
Afiliación
  • Marcarelli AM; Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, 49931, USA.
  • Baxter CV; Department of Biological Sciences, Stream Ecology Center, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, 83209, USA.
  • Benjamin JR; Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Boise, Idaho, 83702, USA.
  • Miyake Y; Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, 790-8577, Japan.
  • Murakami M; Community Ecology Lab, Faculty of Science, Chiba University, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan.
  • Fausch KD; Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA.
  • Nakano S; Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Hirano, Shiga, 520-2113, Japan.
Ecology ; 101(8): e03064, 2020 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32274791
ABSTRACT
Networks of direct and indirect biotic interactions underpin the complex dynamics and stability of ecological systems, yet experimental and theoretical studies often yield conflicting evidence regarding the direction (positive or negative) or magnitude of these interactions. We revisited pioneering data sets collected at the deciduous forested Horonai Stream and conducted ecosystem-level syntheses to demonstrate that the direction of direct and indirect interactions can change depending on the timescale of observation. Prior experimental studies showed that terrestrial prey that enter the stream from the adjacent forest caused positive indirect effects on aquatic invertebrates during summer by diverting fish consumption. Seasonal and annual estimates of secondary production and organic matter flows along food web pathways demonstrate that this seasonal input of terrestrial invertebrate prey increases production of certain fish species, reversing the indirect effect on aquatic invertebrates from positive at the seasonal timescale to negative at the annual timescale. Even though terrestrial invertebrate prey contributed 54% of the annual organic matter flux to fishes, primarily during summer, fish still consumed 98% of the aquatic invertebrate annual production, leading to top-down control that is not revealed in short-term experiments and demonstrating that aquatic prey may be a limiting resource for fishes. Changes in the direction or magnitude of interactions may be a key factor creating nonlinear or stabilizing feedbacks in complex systems, and these dynamics can be revealed by merging experimental and comparative approaches at different scales.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Ríos Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Ecology Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Ríos Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Ecology Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos