Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of bedspacing on outcomes of hospitalised medicine service patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Kohn, Rachel; Harhay, Michael O; Bayes, Brian; Song, Hummy; Halpern, Scott D; Kerlin, Meeta Prasad; Greysen, S Ryan.
Afiliación
  • Kohn R; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA rachel.kohn2@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
  • Harhay MO; Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Bayes B; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Song H; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Halpern SD; Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Kerlin MP; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Greysen SR; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 30(2): 116-122, 2021 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32299956
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Specialty wards cohort hospitalised patients to improve outcomes and lower costs. When demand exceeds capacity, patients overflow and are "bedspaced" to alternate wards. Some studies have demonstrated that bedspacing among medicine service patients is associated with adverse patient-centred outcomes, however, results have been inconsistent and have primarily been performed within national health systems. The objective of this study was to assess the association of bedspacing with patient-centred outcomes among United States patients admitted to general medicine services.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective cohort study of internal medicine, family medicine and geriatric service patients who were bedspaced vs cohorted for the entirety of their hospital stay within three large, urban United States hospitals (quaternary referral centre, tertiary referral centre and community hospital, with different patient demographics and case-mixes) in 2014 and 2015. We performed quantile regression to determine differences in length of stay (LOS) between bedspaced vs cohorted patients and logistic regression for in-hospital mortality and discharge to home.

RESULTS:

Among 18 802 patients in 33 wards, 6119 (33%) patients were bedspaced. Bedspaced patients had significantly longer LOS compared with cohorted patients at the 25th (0.1 days, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.2, p=0.001), 50th (0.2 days, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.3, p=0.003) and 75th (0.3 days, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5, p<0.001) percentiles; and no statistically significant differences in odds of mortality (OR=0.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.3, p=0.5) or discharge to home (OR=0.9, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.0, p=0.06) in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION:

Bedspacing is associated with adverse patient-centred outcomes. Future work is needed to confirm these findings, understand mechanisms contributing to adverse outcomes and identify factors that mitigate these adverse effects in order to provide high-value, patient-centred care to hospitalised patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicare / Hospitalización Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicare / Hospitalización Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos