Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tracing the Decisions That Shaped the Development of MyChart, an Electronic Patient Portal in Alberta, Canada: Historical Research Study.
Avdagovska, Melita; Stafinski, Tania; Ballermann, Mark; Menon, Devidas; Olson, Karin; Paul, Pauline.
Afiliación
  • Avdagovska M; University of Alberta, School of Public Health, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Stafinski T; University of Alberta, School of Public Health, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Ballermann M; University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Menon D; University of Alberta, School of Public Health, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Olson K; University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Paul P; University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(5): e17505, 2020 05 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32452811
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Understanding how health organizations decide on information technology (IT) investments is imperative to ensure successful implementation and adoption. There is a high rate of failure and a tendency to downplay the complexity of implementation progression. Alberta Health Services introduced a patient portal called MyChart. Although MyChart allows patients to view appointments and selected laboratory results and to communicate with their providers, its uptake varies.

OBJECTIVE:

The study aimed to examine the institutional decision-making processes that shaped the development and implementation of MyChart.

METHODS:

A historical study was conducted based on the 7-step framework, where one engages in a rigorous archival critical analysis (including internal and external criticism) of documents and analysis of interviews. We reviewed and analyzed 423 primary and secondary sources and interviewed 10 key decision makers.

RESULTS:

Supportive leadership, project management, focused scope, appropriate technology and vendor selection, and quick decision making were some of the facilitators that allowed for the growth of proof of concept. The planning and implementation stages did not depend much on the technology itself but on the various actors who influenced the implementation by exerting power. The main barriers were lack of awareness about the technology, proper training, buy-in from diverse system leaders, and centralized government decision making.

CONCLUSIONS:

Organizational priorities and decision-making tactics influence IT investments, implementation, adoption, and outcomes. Future research could focus on improving the applicability of needs assessments and funding decisions to health care scenarios.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recolección de Datos / Telemedicina / Toma de Decisiones / Portales del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recolección de Datos / Telemedicina / Toma de Decisiones / Portales del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá