Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intimate Partner Homicides in North Carolina: 2011-2015.
Geary, Shana; Graham, Laurie M; Moracco, Kathryn E; Ranapurwala, Shabbar I; Proescholdbell, Scott K; Macy, Rebecca J.
Afiliación
  • Geary S; supplementary surveillance program manager, Bureau of Communicable Diseases, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, FL.
  • Graham LM; assistant professor, School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Moracco KE; associate professor, Department of Health Behavior and associate director, Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Ranapurwala SI; assistant professor, Department of Epidemiology and Core Faculty Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Proescholdbell SK; epidemiologist, Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina scott.proescholdbell@dhhs.nc.gov.
  • Macy RJ; L. Richardson Preyer Distinguished Chair for Strengthening Families and the associate dean for Research and Faculty Development, School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
N C Med J ; 81(4): 228-235, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641454
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Research on intimate partner homicide (IPH), when someone is killed by a current or former intimate partner, in North Carolina is limited, making it difficult to understand the magnitude of IPHs and identify strategies for prevention.METHOD We used North Carolina Violent Death Reporting System (NC-VDRS) data to assess IPHs among North Carolina residents between 2011 and 2015. Homicides were considered IPHs if intimate partner violence was identified and the victim was the suspect's current or former intimate partner. Proportions and rates of demographic characteristics and circumstances were assessed.RESULTS Of the 2,299 homicides that occurred between 2011 and 2015, 350 were IPHs (0.9 per 100,000 person-years). Most (72.3%) IPH victims were female (n = 253). Among all female homicides almost half (48.2%) were IPHs, while only 5.4% of all male homicides were IPHs. The highest rate of IPH occurred among women aged 20-44 (2.1 per 100,000 person-years). Most victims were non-Hispanic (NH) white (54.0%, n = 189), although rates for NH American Indians and NH blacks were 1.8 and 2.0 times those among NH whites respectively. Most victims, 86.6% male and 82.6% female, were the suspect's current partner. Firearms were the most common weapon used (62.6%, n = 219).LIMITATIONS NC-VDRS data are not representative of all IPHs in the United States. Circumstance data were sometimes incomplete and categories of circumstance variables restrictive, limiting available information on IPHs.CONCLUSION Future interventions focused on women aged 20-44, NH American Indian and NH Black communities, and firearm access could be effective in preventing IPHs in North Carolina.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Violencia de Pareja / Homicidio Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: N C Med J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Violencia de Pareja / Homicidio Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: N C Med J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article