[Analysis of the safety and efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma with the first second forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV(1)%pred)<60].

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in severe asthma patients with the first second forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV(1)%pred) <60%. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 75 patients with asthma who were treated with BT at Shenzhen University Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2016 to January 2018. The patients were divided into two groups based on the FEV(1)%pred before treatment FEV(1)%pred <60% group (39 cases) and FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group (36 cases). Comparative analysis of glucocorticoid consumption, times of acute attack, asthma control test (ACT) score, changes in lung function, and adverse reactions at 3 weeks after treatment were performed between the two groups of patients. Results: Before BT treatment, the consumption of oral prednisone, the amount of budesonide inhaled, and the times of acute attack [M (Q(1), Q(3))] in the FEV(1)%pred <60% group were significantly greater than those in the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group, and the ACT score was significantly lower than the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group [10.00 (0, 20.00) vs 0(0, 3.75) mg/d, 960 (320, 960) vs 320 (320, 640) µg/d, 5(4, 8) vs 4 (4, 5) times/year, 13 (9, 15) vs 17 (13, 19) scores] (all P<0.05). Except that the oral prednisone dosage in the FEV(1)%pred<60% group was still higher 1 year after treatment [0 (0, 5.00) vs 0 (0, 0) mg/d] (P=0.009), there was no significant difference in the remaining indicators between the two groups 1 year after treatment and 2 years after treatment (all P>0.05). After 1 year and 2 years of treatment, all indicators in the two groups were better than before treatment (all P<0.05). The inhaled budesonide amount and the times of acute exacerbation in the FEV(1)%pred <60% group 2 years after treatment were less than those 1 year after treatment [320 (320, 320) vs 320 (320, 640) µg/d, 0 (0, 0) vs 0(0, 1) times/year] (all P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the remaining indicators. In the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group, there was no significant difference between 2 years after treatment and 1 year after treatment in the above indicators except the amount of inhaled budesonide (all P>0.05). In the FEV(1)%pred <60% group, FEV(1) and the FEV(1)%pred were significantly lower than the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group before treatment, 1 year after treatment and 2 years after treatment [FEV(1)(1.21±0.41) vs (2.26±0.80)L, (1.84±0.73) vs (2.30±0.78)L, (1.70±0.66) vs (2.38±0.76)L; FEV(1)%pred46.2 (38.5, 53.7)% vs 80.8(66.5, 93.6)%, 60.1 (48.2, 71.6)% vs 87.4 (68.5, 96.5)%, 58.5 (48.6, 74.8)% vs 86.6 (73.0, 97.3)%] (all P<0.05). In the FEV(1)%pred <60% group, FEV(1) and FEV(1)%pred 1 year after treatment and 2 years after treatment were all increased compared with before treatment (all P<0.05). In the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group, there was no statistical difference in FEV(1) at each time point before and after treatment (all P>0.05), but the FEV(1)%pred at 2 years after treatment was higher than before treatment (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: BT can significantly improve the lung function, reduce the times of acute attack and the dosage of glucocorticoids in severe asthma patients with FEV(1)% pred<60%, which is safe and effective.