Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) achieves very good long-term quality of life in children and adolescents with soft-tissue sarcoma.
Sütterlin, Anna Lotte; Demmert, Martin; Kovács, György; Claviez, Alexander; Schulz, Christian; Lauten, Melchior.
Afiliación
  • Sütterlin AL; Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Demmert M; Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Kovács G; Department of Radiotherapy, Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Claviez A; Gemelli INTERACTS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Schulz C; Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Lauten M; Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 67(10): e28464, 2020 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32706504
BACKGROUND: Effective local therapy (surgery, radiation) and systemic multidrug chemotherapy are mandatory for curing childhood sarcoma. The standard radiation therapy for pediatric patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Because EBRT may cause long-term side effects with adverse effects on the patients' health and quality of life (QoL), alternative strategies are required. Interventional radiotherapy (IRT; brachytherapy) is established as a standard treatment for several tumors in adulthood. Single-center series have reported low levels of late effects and improved QoL in survivors treated with IRT in childhood. However, IRT is still applied infrequently in pediatric patients. METHODS: Thirty patients with STS were treated with IRT between 1992 and 2012 at the University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Germany. Five patients were lost to follow-up, and 25 patients (mean age at time of data collection 24.8 years [range, 10.7-36.1]) could be analyzed focusing on overall survival and QoL (EORTC-C30 questionnaire). For more detailed information regarding general and health-specific questions, a separate questionnaire was developed. RESULTS: Nineteen of 25 patients were alive 13.4 [1.6-25.2] years after first cancer disease, and the three-year overall survival was 76% (SE, 0.09). The score of QoL/global health status (76.2 [16.6-100]) in our patients outvalues the European (66.1) and equals the German (75.9) reference value. CONCLUSION: IRT is an effective treatment option for pediatric patients with localized STS. Its role among other radiation dose-sparing techniques such as proton beam therapy has to be defined in prospective studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Sarcoma / Braquiterapia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Blood Cancer Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / PEDIATRIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Sarcoma / Braquiterapia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Blood Cancer Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / PEDIATRIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania