Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjusting for allometric scaling in ABIDE I challenges subcortical volume differences in autism spectrum disorder.
Williams, Camille Michèle; Peyre, Hugo; Toro, Roberto; Beggiato, Anita; Ramus, Franck.
Afiliación
  • Williams CM; Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.
  • Peyre H; Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.
  • Toro R; INSERM UMR 1141, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.
  • Beggiato A; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Robert Debré Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
  • Ramus F; U1284, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), INSERM, Paris, France.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 41(16): 4610-4629, 2020 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32729664
Inconsistencies across studies investigating subcortical correlates of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may stem from small sample size, sample heterogeneity, and omitting or linearly adjusting for total brain volume (TBV). To properly adjust for TBV, brain allometry-the nonlinear scaling relationship between regional volumes and TBV-was considered when examining subcortical volumetric differences between typically developing (TD) and ASD individuals. Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange I (ABIDE I; N = 654) data was analyzed with two methodological approaches: univariate linear mixed effects models and multivariate multiple group confirmatory factor analyses. Analyses were conducted on the entire sample and in subsamples based on age, sex, and full scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ). A similar ABIDE I study was replicated and the impact of different TBV adjustments on neuroanatomical group differences was investigated. No robust subcortical allometric or volumetric group differences were observed in the entire sample across methods. Exploratory analyses suggested that allometric scaling and volume group differences may exist in certain subgroups defined by age, sex, and/or FSIQ. The type of TBV adjustment influenced some reported volumetric and scaling group differences. This study supports the absence of robust volumetric differences between ASD and TD individuals in the investigated volumes when adjusting for brain allometry, expands the literature by finding no group difference in allometric scaling, and further suggests that differing TBV adjustments contribute to the variability of reported neuroanatomical differences in ASD.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Neuroimagen / Trastorno del Espectro Autista Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hum Brain Mapp Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Neuroimagen / Trastorno del Espectro Autista Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hum Brain Mapp Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia