Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Food Safety and Hygiene Training on Food Handlers.
Insfran-Rivarola, Andrea; Tlapa, Diego; Limon-Romero, Jorge; Baez-Lopez, Yolanda; Miranda-Ackerman, Marco; Arredondo-Soto, Karina; Ontiveros, Sinue.
Afiliación
  • Insfran-Rivarola A; Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay, San Lorenzo 2160, Paraguay.
  • Tlapa D; Facultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada 22870, Mexico.
  • Limon-Romero J; Facultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada 22870, Mexico.
  • Baez-Lopez Y; Facultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada 22870, Mexico.
  • Miranda-Ackerman M; Facultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada 22870, Mexico.
  • Arredondo-Soto K; Facultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tijuana 22390, Mexico.
  • Ontiveros S; Facultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tijuana 22390, Mexico.
Foods ; 9(9)2020 Aug 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32854221
Foodborne diseases are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Studies have shown that the knowledge, attitude, and practices of food handlers are important factors in preventing foodborne illness. The purpose of this research is to assess the effects of training interventions on knowledge, attitude, and practice on food safety and hygiene among food handlers at different stages of the food supply chain. To this end, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with close adherence to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched for training interventions among food handlers in five databases. Randomized control trials (RCT), quasi-RCTs, controlled before-after, and nonrandomized designs, including pre-post studies, were analyzed to allow a more comprehensive assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model to calculate the effect sizes (Hedges's g) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Out of 1094 studies, 31 were included. Results showed an effect size of 1.24 (CI = 0.89-1.58) for knowledge, an attitude effect size of 0.28 (CI = 0.07-0.48), and an overall practice effect size of 0.65 (CI = 0.24-1.06). In addition, subgroups of self-reported practices and observed practices presented effect sizes of 0.80 (CI = 0.13-1.48) and 0.45 (CI = 0.15-0.76) respectively.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Foods Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Paraguay

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Foods Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Paraguay