Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing patients' and other stakeholders' preferences for outcomes of integrated care for multimorbidity: a discrete choice experiment in eight European countries.
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen; Karimi, Milad; Leijten, Fenna; Hoedemakers, Maaike; Looman, Willemijn; Islam, Kamrul; Askildsen, Jan E; Kraus, Markus; Ercevic, Darija; Struckmann, Verena; Gyorgy Pitter, János; Cano, Isaac; Stokes, Jonathan; Jonker, Marcel.
Afiliación
  • Rutten-van Mölken M; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands m.rutten@eshpm.eur.nl.
  • Karimi M; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Leijten F; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hoedemakers M; Staff Defence Healthcare Organisation, Ministry of defence, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Looman W; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Islam K; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Askildsen JE; Department of Economics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
  • Kraus M; Department of Economics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
  • Ercevic D; Institut fur Hohere Studien, Wien, Austria.
  • Struckmann V; Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Gyorgy Pitter J; Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Cano I; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Stokes J; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
  • Jonker M; Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester Institute of Population Health, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open ; 10(10): e037547, 2020 10 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33039997
OBJECTIVES: To measure relative preferences for outcomes of integrated care of patients with multimorbidity from eight European countries and compare them to the preferences of other stakeholders within these countries. DESIGN: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in each country, asking respondents to choose between two integrated care programmes for persons with multimorbidity. SETTING: Preference data collected in Austria (AT), Croatia (HR), Germany (DE), Hungary (HU), the Netherlands (NL), Norway (NO), Spain (ES), and UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with multimorbidity, partners and other informal caregivers, professionals, payers and policymakers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences of participants regarding outcomes of integrated care described as health/well-being, experience with care and cost outcomes, that is, physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships and participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centredness, continuity of care and total costs. Each outcome had three levels of performance. RESULTS: 5122 respondents completed the DCE. In all countries, patients with multimorbidity, as well as most other stakeholder groups, assigned the (second) highest preference to enjoyment of life. The patients top-three most frequently included physical functioning, psychological well-being and continuity of care. Continuity of care also entered the top-three of professionals, payers and policymakers in four countries (AT, DE, HR and HU). Of the five stakeholder groups, preferences of professionals differed most often from preferences of patients. Professionals assigned lower weights to physical functioning in AT, DE, ES, NL and NO and higher weights to person-centredness in AT, DE, ES and HU. Payers and policymakers assigned higher weights than patients to costs, but these weights were relatively low. CONCLUSION: The well-being outcome enjoyment of life is the most important outcome of integrated care in multimorbidity. This calls for a greater involvement of social and mental care providers. The difference in opinion between patients and professionals calls for shared decision-making, whereby efforts to improve well-being and person-centredness should not divert attention from improving physical functioning.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud / Multimorbilidad Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud / Multimorbilidad Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos