Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of low back pain and its remission on motor abundance in a low-load lifting task.
Liew, Bernard X W; De Nunzio, Alessandro Marco; Srivastava, Shraddha; Falla, Deborah.
Afiliación
  • Liew BXW; School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, Essex, UK. bl19622@essex.ac.uk.
  • De Nunzio AM; LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, 50, avenue du Parc des Sports, 4671, Differdange, Luxembourg.
  • Srivastava S; Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, 77 President Street, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
  • Falla D; Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B152TT, UK.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 17831, 2020 10 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33082380
ABSTRACT
Having an abundance of motor solutions during movement may be advantageous for the health of musculoskeletal tissues, given greater load distribution between tissues. The aim of the present study was to understand whether motor abundance differs between people with and without low back pain (LBP) during a low-load lifting task. Motion capture with electromyography (EMG) assessment of 15 muscles was performed on 48 participants [healthy control (con) = 16, remission LBP (rLBP) = 16, current LBP (cLBP) = 16], during lifting. Non-negative matrix factorization and uncontrolled manifold analysis were performed to decompose inter-repetition variability in the temporal activity of muscle modes into goal equivalent (GEV) and non-goal equivalent (NGEV) variabilities in the control of the pelvis and trunk linear displacements. Motor abundance occurs when the ratio of GEV to NGEV exceeds zero. There were significant group differences in the temporal activity of muscle modes, such that both cLBP and rLBP individuals demonstrated greater activity of muscle modes that reflected lumbopelvic coactivation during the lifting phase compared to controls. For motor abundance, there were no significant differences between groups. Individuals with LBP, including those in remission, had similar overall motor abundance, but use different activation profiles of muscle modes than asymptomatic people during lifting.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas / Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Elevación Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas / Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Elevación Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido