Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Schedule-Dependent Synergy Between the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Belinostat and the Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitor Pralatrexate in T-and B-cell Lymphoma Cells in vitro.
Peters, Godefridus J; van Gemert, Frank P A; Kathmann, Ietje; Reddy, Guru; Cillessen, Saskia A G M; Jansen, Gerrit.
Afiliación
  • Peters GJ; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • van Gemert FPA; Department of Biochemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
  • Kathmann I; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Reddy G; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Cillessen SAGM; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Jansen G; Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Cell Dev Biol ; 8: 577215, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33163492
ABSTRACT
Pralatrexate (Folotyn; PLX) and belinostat (Beleodaq; BLS) are registered for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and are being considered for other lymphomas. In this study we investigated whether BLS had the ability to potentiate the cytotoxicity of PLX. A panel of lymphoma cell lines was used for the combination studies the B-cell SUDHL-4, SUDHL-5, HT, Jeko-1 and T-cell Karpas-299 and Hut-78. Uptake of PLX was mediated by the reduced folate carrier (RFC). PLX showed a 6-fold better RFC substrate affinity compared to methotrexate, and 2-fold better than levoleucovorin (l-LV). Sensitivity expressed as the concentration that resulted in 50% growth inhibition (IC50) after 72 hr exposure to PLX varied from 2.8 to 20 nM and for BLS from 72 to 233 nM, independent of the background of the cell lines. The interaction between BLS and PLX was studied using the median-drug effect analysis. At a fixed molar ratio between the drugs based on the IC50 concentration the average combination index (CI) for all cell lines showed additivity (CI around 1.0). In three selected cell lines (SUDHL-4, SUDHL-5, and HT) sequential exposure (24 h pretreatment with BLS, followed by 48 h to PLX + BLS), did not improve interaction (CI 0.9-1.4). As an alternative approach a non-fixed ratio was used by exposing SUDHL-4, SUDHL-5, and HT cells to IC25 concentrations of either BLS or PLX in combination with the other drug. Exposure to IC25 of PLX did not decrease the IC50 for BLS (CI from 0.6-1.2), but exposure to IC25 of BLS markedly increased PLX sensitivity (low CIs from 0.40 to 0.66). Mechanistic studies focused on induction of apoptosis, and showed cleavage of predominantly caspase-9 in HT and SUDHL-4 cells for both drugs at their IC50s, being similar in the combination setting. Moreover, at these concentrations, the drugs were shown to confer an S-phase arrest. In conclusion, the combination of PLX and BLS showed additivity in various lymphoma cell lines, with a schedule-dependent synergism in B-cell lymphoma. Based on these data, proficient inhibition of HDAC activity by BLS holds promise in sensitization of tumor cells to PLX.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cell Dev Biol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cell Dev Biol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos