Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Within- and Between-Household Variation in Food Expenditures Among Low-Income Households Using a Novel Simple Annotated Receipt Method.
Valluri, Sruthi; French, Simone A; Elbel, Brian; Oakes, J Michael; Rydell, Sarah A; Harnack, Lisa J.
Afiliación
  • Valluri S; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • French SA; Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Elbel B; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Oakes JM; School of Medicine and Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
  • Rydell SA; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Harnack LJ; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Front Nutr ; 7: 582999, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33195373
ABSTRACT

Background:

Household food purchasing behavior has gained interest as an intervention to improve nutrition and nutrition-associated outcomes. However, evaluating food expenditures is challenging in epidemiological studies. Assessment methods that are both valid and feasible for use among diverse, low-income populations are needed. We therefore developed a novel simple annotated receipt method to assess household food purchasing. First, we describe and evaluate the extent to which the method captures food purchasing information. We then evaluate within- and between-household variation in weekly food purchasing to determine sample sizes and the number of weeks of data needed to measure household food purchasing with adequate precision.

Methods:

Four weeks of food purchase receipt data were collected from 260 low-income households in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. The proportion of receipt line items that could not be coded into one of 11 food categories (unidentified) was calculated, and a zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to evaluate the association between unidentified receipt items and participant characteristics and store type. Within- and between-household coefficients of variation were calculated for total food expenditures and several food categories.

Results:

A low proportion of receipt line items (1.6%) could not be coded into a food category and the incidence of unidentified items did not appreciably vary by participant characteristics. Weekly expenditures on foods high in added sugar had higher within- and between-household coefficients of variation than weekly fruit and vegetable expenditures. To estimate mean weekly food expenditures within 20% of the group's usual ("true") expenditures, 72 households were required. Nine weeks of data were required to achieve an r = 0.90 between observed and usual weekly food expenditures.

Conclusions:

The simple annotated receipt method may be a feasible tool for use in assessing food expenditures of low-income, diverse populations. Within- and between-household coefficients of variation suggest that the number of weeks of data or group sizes required to precisely estimate usual household expenditures is higher for foods high in added sugar compared to fruits and vegetables.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Front Nutr Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Front Nutr Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos