Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The indications and safety of prolonged temporary pacing using active-fixation leads and externalized pulse generator.
Shah, Nisar H; Shah, Parin; Elsayed, Hossam; O'Callaghan, Peter; Leong, Fong T; Yousef, Zaheer.
Afiliación
  • Shah NH; Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Shah P; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Elsayed H; Good Hope Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • O'Callaghan P; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Leong FT; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Yousef Z; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 44(3): 506-512, 2021 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538060
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Temporary cardiac pacing, conventionally achieved using a passive transvenous pacing wire, can be life-saving for unstable arrhythmias. However, they run the risk of complications, the longer they remain in-situ. Externalized prolonged temporary pacing (EPTP), using active-fixation lead and an externalized pulse generator; may be an alternative for transient pacing indications, concurrent illness or sepsis that precludes permanent pacing.

METHODS:

Sixty-seven patients (mean age 69 ± 14 years; 82% male) underwent EPTP between November 2011 and April 2019. EPTP was performed in a sterile facility, under fluoroscopy, using active-fixation leads anchored to the right ventricle septum. Externalized lead was connected to a re-sterilized pulse generator and secured to anterior chest wall with transparent dressings. EPTP indications and patient outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Pacing indications were high-grade atrio-ventricular (AV) block (73.2%), sinus arrest (14.9%), overdrive suppression of VT (5.9%) and pause-dependent VT (4.5%). Reasons for ETPT rather than permanent pacing included sepsis (38.8%), CIED-related infection (8.9%), transient pacing indication (25%), to allow further investigations prior to decision on CIED type (22%), and over-drive arrhythmia suppression (6%). Sixty three percent patients were severely ill in an ICU. Mean duration of pacing was 16 ± 12 days. Sixty seven percent patients subsequently received a CIED and had no evidence of device-related infection at 1-year post-implant. There were three non-fatal complications during EPTP while no deaths were attributed to EPTP.

CONCLUSION:

EPTP is a safe and useful method of prolonged temporary pacing for patients who require chronotropic support, but in whom immediate permanent pacemaker implantation is contraindicated.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Suministros de Energía Eléctrica / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Electrodos Implantados / Bloqueo Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Suministros de Energía Eléctrica / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Electrodos Implantados / Bloqueo Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido