Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pooled Analysis of PFO Occluder Device Trials in Patients With PFO and Migraine.
Mojadidi, Mohammad K; Kumar, Preetham; Mahmoud, Ahmed N; Elgendy, Islam Y; Shapiro, Hilary; West, Brian; Charles, Andrew C; Mattle, Heinrich P; Sorensen, Sherman; Meier, Bernhard; Silberstein, Stephen D; Tobis, Jonathan M.
Afiliación
  • Mojadidi MK; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. Electronic address: mkmojadidi@gmail.com.
  • Kumar P; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Mahmoud AN; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Elgendy IY; Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
  • Shapiro H; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • West B; Division of Cardiology, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Charles AC; Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Mattle HP; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Sorensen S; Sorensen Cardiovascular Group, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Meier B; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Silberstein SD; Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Tobis JM; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 77(6): 667-676, 2021 02 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33573735
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although observational studies have shown percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure to be a safe means of reducing the frequency and duration of migraine, randomized clinical trials have not met their primary efficacy endpoints.

OBJECTIVES:

The authors report the results of a pooled analysis of individual participant data from the 2 randomized trials using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous device closure as a therapy for episodic migraine with or without aura.

METHODS:

The authors analyzed individual patient-level data from 2 randomized migraine trials (the PRIMA [Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Migraine With Aura] and PREMIUM [Prospective Randomized Investigation to Evaluate Incidence of Headache Reduction in Subjects with Migraine and PFO Using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder Compared to Medical Management] studies). Efficacy endpoints were mean reduction in monthly migraine days, responder rate (defined as ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine attacks), mean reduction in monthly migraine attacks, and percentage of patients who experienced complete cessation of migraine. The safety endpoint was major procedure- and device-related adverse events.

RESULTS:

Among 337 subjects, 176 were randomized by blocks to device closure and 161 to medical treatment only. At 12-month follow-up, the analysis met 3 of the 4 efficacy endpoints mean reduction of monthly migraine days (-3.1 days vs. -1.9 days; p = 0.02), mean reduction of monthly migraine attacks (-2.0 vs. -1.4; p = 0.01), and number of subjects who experienced complete cessation of migraine (14 [9%] vs. 1 [0.7%]; p < 0.001). For the safety analysis, 9 procedure-related and 4 device-related adverse events occurred in 245 subjects who eventually received devices. All events were transient and resolved.

CONCLUSIONS:

This pooled analysis of patient-level data demonstrates that PFO closure was safe and significantly reduced the mean number of monthly migraine days and monthly migraine attacks, and resulted in a greater number of subjects who experienced complete migraine cessation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Foramen Oval Permeable / Dispositivo Oclusor Septal / Trastornos Migrañosos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Cardiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Foramen Oval Permeable / Dispositivo Oclusor Septal / Trastornos Migrañosos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Cardiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article