Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinic factors associated with utilization of a pregnancy-intention screening tool in community health centers.
Hatch, Brigit; Schmidt, Teresa; Davis, Eva; Templeton, Anna Rose; Hoopes, Megan; Darney, Blair; Cottrell, Erika K.
Afiliación
  • Hatch B; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; OCHIN, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: adamusb@ohsu.edu.
  • Schmidt T; OCHIN, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Davis E; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Templeton AR; OCHIN, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Hoopes M; OCHIN, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Darney B; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA; Instituto Nacional de Salud Pulica, Centro de Investigacion en Salud Poblacional, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
  • Cottrell EK; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; OCHIN, Portland, OR, USA.
Contraception ; 103(5): 336-341, 2021 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33592233
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Routine pregnancy-intention screening in the primary care setting is a promising practice to help patients achieve their reproductive goals. We aim to describe the utilization of a pregnancy-intention screening tool integrated in the electronic health record (EHR) of a national network of community health centers (CHCs) and identify clinic-level factors associated with tool use. STUDY

DESIGN:

We conducted a clinic-level retrospective observational study to assess tool utilization during the first 3 years after the tool was made available in the EHR (November 2015 to October 2018). We describe characteristics of clinics with higher tool utilization (≥90th percentile) versus lower utilization (<90th percentile) and the types of providers who used the tool. We then employ negative binomial regression to identify independent clinic-level factors associated with tool utilization.

RESULTS:

Across 194 clinics in our study sample which served 289,754 eligible female patients, the tool was used for 113,116 (39%). Medical assistants performed 60.3% of screenings and clinicians performed 11.2%. CHCs with higher tool utilization rates were more likely to be located in rural settings (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.07-2.87) and serve patient populations with higher proportions of women (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.41) and lower proportions of patients with non-English language preference (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS:

Many health centers utilized pregnancy-intention screening after an EHR-based tool was made available, though overall screening rates were low. IMPLICATIONS Additional study of implementation strategies and effectiveness of pregnancy-intention screening tools is needed. Implementation of future pregnancy-intention screening interventions must be tailored to address clinic-level barriers and facilitators to screening.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Centros Comunitarios de Salud / Intención Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Centros Comunitarios de Salud / Intención Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article