Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frontal brain areas are more involved during motor imagery than during motor execution/preparation of a response sequence.
Van der Lubbe, Rob H J; Sobierajewicz, Jagna; Jongsma, Marijtje L A; Verwey, Willem B; Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Anna.
Afiliación
  • Van der Lubbe RHJ; Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, Faculty of Behavior, Management, and Social Sciences, University of Twente, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; Laboratory of Vision and Neuroscience, NanoBiomedical Center,
  • Sobierajewicz J; Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; Laboratory of Vision and Neuroscience, NanoBiomedical Center, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
  • Jongsma MLA; Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Verwey WB; Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, Faculty of Behavior, Management, and Social Sciences, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
  • Przekoracka-Krawczyk A; Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; Laboratory of Vision and Neuroscience, NanoBiomedical Center, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Int J Psychophysiol ; 164: 71-86, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33647383
Results of several neuroimaging studies support the functional equivalence model, which states that motor imagery (MI) and motor execution (ME) involve the same processes, except for the final execution component. In contrast, the motor-cognitive model implies that MI additionally involves frontal executive control processes. However, according to some authors MI may actually be more comparable to motor preparation (MP). In the current electroencephalographic study, a version of the discrete sequence production paradigm was employed in which human participants initially had to prepare a sequence of five finger movements that subsequently had to be executed, imagined, or withheld. MI, ME, and MP were compared by computing event-related (de)-synchronization in the theta, alpha/mu, and beta bands. Results revealed a major increase in frontal theta power during MI as compared to ME and MP. At the end of the examined intervals, a posterior reduction in alpha power was present during ME and MP, but not during MI. Finally, above sensorimotor areas a decrease in beta power was observed that was most pronounced in the case of ME. The increase of frontal theta activity during MI may reflect increased effort, while the absence of a reduction in posterior alpha power suggests no major involvement of visuospatial attention and/or visual imagery. The present findings favor the motor-cognitive model, as it predicts extra involvement of frontal executive processes during MI.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desempeño Psicomotor / Imaginación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desempeño Psicomotor / Imaginación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article