Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode.
Ludwig, Sonja; Riemann, Niklas; Hans, Stefan; Christov, Florian; Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian; Saxe, Judith; Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana.
Afiliación
  • Ludwig S; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany. sonja.ludwig@umm.de.
  • Riemann N; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. sonja.ludwig@umm.de.
  • Hans S; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Christov F; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Ludwig JM; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Saxe J; ENT Practice Cologne-Bonn, Wesseling, Germany.
  • Arweiler-Harbeck D; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(3): 1233-1242, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33830367
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing.

METHODS:

A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison.

RESULTS:

We compared 17 RH-30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E® phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción del Habla / Implantes Cocleares / Implantación Coclear / Sordera Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción del Habla / Implantes Cocleares / Implantación Coclear / Sordera Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania