Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.
Allanach, Jessica R; Farrell, John W; Mésidor, Miceline; Karimi-Abdolrezaee, Soheila.
Afiliación
  • Allanach JR; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Farrell JW; Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
  • Mésidor M; Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada/Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  • Karimi-Abdolrezaee S; Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Regenerative Medicine Program, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada/Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Mult Scler ; 28(1): 29-48, 2022 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33870797
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Immune-mediated demyelination and consequent degeneration of oligodendrocytes and axons are hallmark features of multiple sclerosis (MS). Remyelination declines in progressive MS, causing permanent axonal loss and irreversible disabilities. Strategies aimed at enhancing remyelination are critical to attenuate disease progression.

OBJECTIVE:

We systematically reviewed recent advances in neuroprotective and regenerative therapies for MS, covering preclinical and clinical studies.

METHODS:

We searched three biomedical databases using defined keywords. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion based on pre-specified criteria. The data were extracted from each study and assessed for risk of bias.

RESULTS:

Our search identified 7351 studies from 2014 to 2020, of which 221 met the defined criteria. These studies reported 262 interventions, wherein 92% were evaluated in animal models. These interventions comprised protein, RNA, lipid and cellular biologics, small molecules, inorganic compounds, and dietary and physiological interventions. Small molecules were the most highly represented strategy, followed by antibody therapies and stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSION:

While significant strides have been made to develop regenerative treatments for MS, the current evidence illustrates a skewed representation of the types of strategies that advance to clinical trials. Further examination is thus required to address current barriers to implementing experimental treatments in clinical settings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Remielinización / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Mult Scler Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Remielinización / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Mult Scler Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá