Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria From Septic Patients Using 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene-Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing.
Fida, Madiha; Wolf, Matthew J; Hamdi, Ahmed; Vijayvargiya, Prakhar; Esquer Garrigos, Zerelda; Khalil, Sarwat; Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E; Thoendel, Matthew J; Patel, Robin.
Afiliación
  • Fida M; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Wolf MJ; Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Hamdi A; Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Vijayvargiya P; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Esquer Garrigos Z; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Khalil S; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississipi, USA.
  • Greenwood-Quaintance KE; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Thoendel MJ; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississipi, USA.
  • Patel R; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(7): 1165-1172, 2021 10 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33893492
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Conventional blood cultures were compared to plasma cell-free DNA-based 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detection and identification of potential pathogens in patients with sepsis.

METHODS:

Plasma was prospectively collected from 60 adult patients with sepsis presenting to the Mayo Clinic (Minnesota) Emergency Department from March through August 2019. Results of routine clinical blood cultures were compared to those of 16S rRNA gene NGS.

RESULTS:

Nineteen (32%) subjects had positive blood cultures, of which 13 yielded gram-negative bacilli, 5 gram-positive cocci, and 1 both gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci. 16S rRNA gene NGS findings were concordant in 11. For the remaining 8, 16S rRNA gene NGS results yielded discordant detections (n = 5) or were negative (n = 3). Interestingly, Clostridium species were additionally detected by 16S rRNA gene NGS in 3 of the 6 subjects with gastrointestinal sources of gram-negative bacteremia and none of the 3 subjects with urinary sources of gram-negative bacteremia. In the 41 remaining subjects, 16S rRNA gene NGS detected at least 1 potentially pathogenic organism in 17. In 15, the detected microorganism clinically correlated with the patient's syndrome. In 17 subjects with a clinically defined infectious syndrome, neither test was positive; in the remaining 7 subjects, a noninfectious cause of clinical presentation was identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

16S rRNA gene NGS may be useful for detecting bacteria in plasma of septic patients. In some cases of gram-negative sepsis, it may be possible to pinpoint a gastrointestinal or urinary source of sepsis based on the profile of bacteria detected in plasma.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bacterias / Sepsis Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bacterias / Sepsis Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos