Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addressing distress management challenges: Recommendations from the consensus panel of the American Psychosocial Oncology Society and the Association of Oncology Social Work.
Deshields, Teresa L; Wells-Di Gregorio, Sharla; Flowers, Stacy R; Irwin, Kelly E; Nipp, Ryan; Padgett, Lynne; Zebrack, Brad.
Afiliación
  • Deshields TL; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Wells-Di Gregorio S; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Flowers SR; Department of Family Medicine, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.
  • Irwin KE; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Nipp R; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Padgett L; Department of Psychology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Zebrack B; School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 71(5): 407-436, 2021 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34028809
Distress management (DM) (screening and response) is an essential component of cancer care across the treatment trajectory. Effective DM has many benefits, including improving patients' quality of life; reducing distress, anxiety, and depression; contributing to medical cost offsets; and reducing emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Unfortunately, many distressed patients do not receive needed services. There are several multilevel barriers that represent key challenges to DM and affect its implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as an organizational structure to outline the barriers and facilitators to implementation of DM, including: 1) individual characteristics (individual patient characteristics with a focus on groups who may face unique barriers to distress screening and linkage to services), 2) intervention (unique aspects of DM intervention, including specific challenges in screening and psychosocial intervention, with recommendations for resolving these challenges), 3) processes for implementation of DM (modality and timing of screening, the challenge of triage for urgent needs, and incorporation of patient-reported outcomes and quality measures), 4) organization-inner setting (the context of the clinic, hospital, or health care system); and 5) organization-outer setting (including reimbursement strategies and health-care policy). Specific recommendations for evidence-based strategies and interventions for each of the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research are also included to address barriers and challenges.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estrés Psicológico / Tamizaje Masivo / Atención a la Salud / Distrés Psicológico / Servicios de Salud Mental / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: CA Cancer J Clin Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estrés Psicológico / Tamizaje Masivo / Atención a la Salud / Distrés Psicológico / Servicios de Salud Mental / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: CA Cancer J Clin Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article