Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic contribution of contrast-enhanced 3D MR imaging of peripheral nerve pathology.
Deshmukh, Swati; Tegtmeyer, Kyle; Kovour, Mounisha; Ahlawat, Shivani; Samet, Jonathan.
Afiliación
  • Deshmukh S; Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  • Tegtmeyer K; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  • Kovour M; University of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign, 601 E John St, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.
  • Ahlawat S; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
  • Samet J; Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Skeletal Radiol ; 50(12): 2509-2518, 2021 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052869
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the diagnostic contribution of contrast-enhanced 3D STIR (ce3D-SS) high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of peripheral nerve pathology relative to conventional 2D sequences. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this IRB-approved retrospective study, two radiologists reviewed 60 MR neurography studies with nerve pathology findings. The diagnostic contribution of ce3D-SS imaging was scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = no additional information, 2 = supports interpretation, 3 = moderate additional information, and 4 = diagnosis not possible without ce3D-SS). Image quality, nerve visualization, and detection of nerve pathology were also assessed for both standard 2D neurography and ce3D-SS sequences utilizing a 3-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics are reported.

RESULTS:

The diagnostic contribution score for ce3D-SS imaging was 2.25 for the brachial plexus, 1.50 for extremities, and 1.75 for the lumbosacral plexus. For brachial plexus, the mean consensus scores for image quality, nerve visualization, and detection of nerve pathology were 2.55, 2.5, and 2.55 for 2D and 2.35, 2.45, and 2.45 for 3D. For extremities, the mean consensus scores for image quality, nerve visualization, and detection of nerve pathology were 2.60, 2.80, and 2.70 for 2D and 1.8, 2.20, and 2.10 for 3D. For lumbosacral plexus, the mean consensus scores for image quality, nerve visualization, and detection of nerve pathology were 2.45, 2.75, and 2.65 for 2D and 2.0, 2.45, and 2.25 for 3D.

CONCLUSION:

Overall, our study supports the potential application of ce3D-SS imaging for MRN of the brachial plexus but suggests that 2D MRN protocols are sufficient for MRN of the extremities and lumbosacral plexus.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plexo Braquial / Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plexo Braquial / Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos