Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Empirical and Earth system model estimates of boreal nitrogen fixation often differ: A pathway toward reconciliation.
Hupperts, Stefan F; Gerber, Stefan; Nilsson, Marie-Charlotte; Gundale, Michael J.
Afiliación
  • Hupperts SF; Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Gerber S; Soil and Water Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Nilsson MC; Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Gundale MJ; Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Glob Chang Biol ; 27(22): 5711-5725, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34382301
ABSTRACT
The impacts of global environmental change on productivity in northern latitudes will be contingent on nitrogen (N) availability. In circumpolar boreal ecosystems, nonvascular plants (i.e., bryophytes) and associated N2 -fixing diazotrophs provide one of the largest known N inputs but are rarely accounted for in Earth system models. Instead, most models link N2 -fixation with the functioning of vascular plants. Neglecting nonvascular N2 -fixation may be contributing toward high uncertainty that currently hinders model predictions in northern latitudes, where nonvascular N2 -fixing plants are more common. Adequately accounting for nonvascular N2 -fixation and its drivers could subsequently improve predictions of future N availability and ultimately, productivity, in northern latitudes. Here, we review empirical evidence of boreal nonvascular N2 -fixation responses to global change factors (elevated CO2 , N deposition, warming, precipitation, and shading by vascular plants), and compare empirical findings with model predictions of N2 -fixation using nine Earth system models. The majority of empirical studies found positive effects of CO2 , warming, precipitation, or light on nonvascular N2 -fixation, but N deposition strongly downregulated N2 -fixation in most empirical studies. Furthermore, we found that the responses of N2 -fixation to elevated CO2 were generally consistent between models and very limited empirical data. In contrast, empirical-model comparisons suggest that all models we assessed, and particularly those that scale N2 -fixation with net primary productivity or evapotranspiration, may be overestimating N2 -fixation under increasing N deposition. Overestimations could generate erroneous predictions of future N stocks in boreal ecosystems unless models adequately account for the drivers of nonvascular N2 -fixation. Based on our comparisons, we recommend that models explicitly treat nonvascular N2 -fixation and that field studies include more targeted measurements to improve model structures and parameterization.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Briófitas / Fijación del Nitrógeno Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Briófitas / Fijación del Nitrógeno Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia