Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of prehabilitation on objectively measured physical activity levels in elective surgery patients: a systematic review.
Wagnild, Janelle M; Akowuah, Enoch; Maier, Rebecca H; Hancock, Helen C; Kasim, Adetayo.
Afiliación
  • Wagnild JM; Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK j.m.wagnild@dur.ac.uk.
  • Akowuah E; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Maier RH; Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Hancock HC; Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Kasim A; Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(9): e049202, 2021 09 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34493516
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the impact of prehabilitation on objectively measured physical activity (PA) levels in elective surgery patients. DATA SOURCES: Articles published in Web of Science Core Collections, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), PsycInfo (EBSCOHost) and CENTRAL through August 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that met the following criteria: (1) written in English, (2) quantitatively described the effect(s) of a PA intervention among elective surgery patients prior to surgery and (3) used and reported objective measures of PA in the study. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Participant characteristics, intervention details, PA measurement, and clinical and health-related outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed following the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity, therefore narrative synthesis was used. RESULTS: 6533 unique articles were identified in the search; 21 articles (based on 15 trials) were included in the review. There was little evidence to suggest that prehabilitation is associated with increases in objectively measured PA, but this may be due to insufficient statistical power as most (n=8) trials included in the review were small feasibility/pilot studies. Where studies tested associations between objectively measured PA during the intervention period and health-related outcomes, significant beneficial associations were reported. Limitations in the evidence base precluded any assessment via meta-regression of the association between objectively measured PA and clinical or health-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Additional large-scale studies are needed, with clear and consistent reporting of objective measures including accelerometry variables and outcome variables, to improve our understanding of the impact of changes in PA prior to surgery on surgical and health-related outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019151475.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ejercicio Físico / Ejercicio Preoperatorio Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ejercicio Físico / Ejercicio Preoperatorio Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article