Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations for follow-up interval after colonoscopy with inadequate bowel preparation in a national colonoscopy quality registry.
Calderwood, Audrey H; Holub, Jennifer L; Greenwald, David A.
Afiliación
  • Calderwood AH; Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and the Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Holub JL; GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Ltd, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Greenwald DA; Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 95(2): 360-367.e2, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34563501
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Endoscopist recommendations regarding a repeat colonoscopy after inadequate bowel cleanliness have not been fully described. Our aim was to evaluate the timing of recommendations for repeat colonoscopy after inadequate bowel preparation using a large, national colonoscopy registry.

METHODS:

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of all outpatient screening and surveillance colonoscopies among adults ages 50 to 75 reported in the GI Quality Improvement Consortium from 2011 to 2018. The primary outcome was a recommendation to repeat colonoscopy within 1 year. Secondary outcomes were recommendations based on indication of colonoscopy and colonoscopy findings and predictors of a recommendation to follow-up within 1 year.

RESULTS:

There were 260,314 colonoscopies with inadequate bowel preparation performed at 672 different sites by 4001 endoscopists. Of these, 31.9% contained a recommendation for follow-up within 1 year. This did not differ meaningfully by examination indication. The severity of colonoscopy findings influenced the recommendations for follow-up (within 1 year in 84.0% of cases with adenocarcinoma, 51.8% with any advanced lesion, and 23.2% with 1-2 small adenomas). Younger age, more severe pathology, location in the Northeast, and performance by an endoscopist with an adenoma detection rate ≥25% were associated with recommendations for follow-up within 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS:

Only some colonoscopies with inadequate bowel preparation are recommended to be repeated within 1 year, which may have implications for potential missed lesions. Further understanding of reasons driving recommendations is an important next step to improving guideline-concordant colonoscopy practice.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos