Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a "coffee-break" CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines.
Bartlett, Emily C; Kemp, Samuel V; Rawal, Bhavin; Devaraj, Anand.
Afiliación
  • Bartlett EC; Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK. E.Bartlett@rbht.nhs.uk.
  • Kemp SV; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, SW3 6LY, UK. E.Bartlett@rbht.nhs.uk.
  • Rawal B; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
  • Devaraj A; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK.
Eur Radiol ; 32(3): 1912-1920, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34580748
OBJECTIVES: An increase in lung nodule volume on serial CT may represent true growth or measurement variation. In nodule guidelines, a 25% increase in nodule volume is frequently used to determine that growth has occurred; this is based on previous same-day, test-retest (coffee-break) studies examining metastatic nodules. Whether results from prior studies apply to small non-metastatic nodules is unknown. This study aimed to establish the interscan variability in the volumetric measurements of small-sized non-metastatic nodules. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. Between March 2019 and January 2021, 45 adults (25 males; mean age 65 years, range 37-84 years) with previously identified pulmonary nodules (30-150 mm3) requiring surveillance, without a known primary tumour, underwent two same-day CT scans. Non-calcified solid nodules were measured using commercial volumetry software, and interscan variability of volume measurements was assessed using a Bland-Altman method and limits of agreement. RESULTS: One hundred nodules (range 28-170 mm3; mean 81.1 mm3) were analysed. The lower and upper limits of agreement for the absolute volume difference between the two scans were - 14.2 mm3 and 12.0 mm3 respectively (mean difference 1.09 mm3, range - 33-12 mm3). The lower and upper limits of agreement for relative volume difference were - 16.4% and 14.6% respectively (mean difference 0.90%, range - 24.1-32.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The interscan volume variability in this cohort of small non-metastatic nodules was smaller than that in previous studies involving lung metastases of varying sizes. An increase of 15% in nodule volume on sequential CT may represent true growth, and closer surveillance of these nodules may be warranted. KEY POINTS: • In current pulmonary nodule management guidelines, a threshold of 25% increase in volume is required to determine that true growth of a pulmonary nodule has occurred. • This test-retest (coffee break) study has demonstrated that a smaller threshold of 15% increase in volume may represent true growth in small non-metastatic nodules. • Closer surveillance of some small nodules growing 15-25% over a short interval may be appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario / Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario / Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article