Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Features, risk factors, and outcomes of older internal medicine patients triggering a medical emergency team call.
Wijesundera, Piyumi; See, Emily J; Robbins, Raymond; Crosthwaite, Amy; Smallwood, David; Jones, Daryl; Bellomo, Rinaldo.
Afiliación
  • Wijesundera P; Department of General Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • See EJ; Intensive Care Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Robbins R; Data Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Crosthwaite A; Department of General Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Smallwood D; Department of General Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Jones D; Intensive Care Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bellomo R; Intensive Care Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(3): 392-400, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34875110
BACKGROUND: Information about the epidemiology of older Internal Medicine patients receiving medical emergency team (MET) calls is limited. We assessed the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of this vulnerable group. METHODS: Internal Medicine patients aged >75 years who were admitted via the Emergency Department to a tertiary hospital between January 2015 to December 2018 and who activated a MET call were compared to patients without MET call activation during the same time period. Outcome measures included management post-MET call, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rates, discharge disposition, length of hospital stays (LOS), and in-patient mortality. RESULTS: There were 10,803 Internal Medical admissions involving 10,423 patients; median age 85 (IQR 81-89) years. Of these, 995 (10%) patients received at least one MET call. MET call patients had greater physiological instability in the Emergency Department and higher median Charlson comorbidity index values (2, IQR 1-3 vs. 1, IQR 0-2; p < .0001) than non-MET call patients. Overall, 10% of MET call patients were admitted to ICU. MET patients had a longer median length of stay (9 [IQR 5-14] vs. 4 days [IQR 2-7]; p < .001) and higher in-hospital mortality (29% vs. 7%; p < .001). However, mortality of MET call patients without treatment limitations was 48/357 (13%). CONCLUSION: One in ten Internal Medicine patients aged >75 years and admitted via ED had a MET call. Physiological instability in ED and comorbidities were key risk factors. Mortality in MET patients approached 30%. These data can help predict at-risk patients for improving goals of care and pre-MET interventions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia