Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of enveloping and disinfection methods on artefact formation on enveloped PSP plate images.
Pamukcu, Umut; Tetik, Hatice; Peker, Ilkay; Karadag Atas, Ozge; Zafersoy Akarslan, Zuhre.
Afiliación
  • Pamukcu U; Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 2. Sokak No: 4 Emek, Ankara, Turkey. dtumutpamukcu@gmail.com.
  • Tetik H; Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 2. Sokak No: 4 Emek, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Peker I; Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 2. Sokak No: 4 Emek, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Karadag Atas O; Department of Statistics, Faculty of Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Zafersoy Akarslan Z; Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 2. Sokak No: 4 Emek, Ankara, Turkey.
Oral Radiol ; 38(4): 558-564, 2022 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35064886
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the artefacts caused by different disinfection and protection methods that can be used for infection control of photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.

METHODS:

The plates that were enveloped with single or double envelopes were sprayed with an alcohol-containing solution or wiped with an alcohol-containing tissue. Four PSP groups with two plates in each group were formed (A = wiping single envelope, B = wiping double envelopes, C = spraying onto single envelope, and D = spraying onto double envelopes). Any artefacts (1 = no artefact, 2 = presence of artefact less than 0.5 cm wide, and 3 = presence of artefact larger than 0.5 cm wide) on the 12 acquired images were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Artefacts (score-3) occurred on the images of Group C-2 PSP plate after the 3rd exposure. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test the difference between the artefact score of the four methods was found significant. Post-hoc comparisons showed the Group C artefact scores were higher than the others and the difference was significant. The total time of enveloping and disinfection processes for groups was; A = 6.30 min, B = 7.58 min, C = 5.48 min, and D = 7.14 min.

CONCLUSIONS:

Regardless of the number of envelopes, wiping with a tissue was less likely to cause artefacts, while spraying was reliable only when double envelopes were used. However, using a tissue and double envelopes, which are less risky in terms of artefact, causes time loss, difficulty in manipulation, environmental pollution and high cost.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desinfección / Artefactos Idioma: En Revista: Oral Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desinfección / Artefactos Idioma: En Revista: Oral Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía