Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of enteric methane production and yield in dairy cattle using a Latin America and Caribbean database.
Congio, Guilhermo F S; Bannink, André; Mayorga, Olga L; Rodrigues, João P P; Bougouin, Adeline; Kebreab, Ermias; Silva, Ricardo R; Maurício, Rogério M; da Silva, Sila C; Oliveira, Patrícia P A; Muñoz, Camila; Pereira, Luiz G R; Gómez, Carlos; Ariza-Nieto, Claudia; Ribeiro-Filho, Henrique M N; Castelán-Ortega, Octavio A; Rosero-Noguera, Jaime R; Tieri, Maria P; Rodrigues, Paulo H M; Marcondes, Marcos I; Astigarraga, Laura; Abarca, Sergio; Hristov, Alexander N.
Afiliación
  • Congio GFS; Department of Animal Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP 13418-900, Brazil. Electronic address: gcongio@gmail.com.
  • Bannink A; Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, AH 6700, the Netherlands.
  • Mayorga OL; Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research, Tibaitatá, Bogotá D.C. 250047, Colombia.
  • Rodrigues JPP; Faculty of Animal Science, Federal University of Southern and Southeastern Pará, Xinguara, PA 68555-110, Brazil.
  • Bougouin A; Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
  • Kebreab E; Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
  • Silva RR; Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil.
  • Maurício RM; Department of Bioengineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, MG 36307-352, Brazil.
  • da Silva SC; Department of Animal Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP 13418-900, Brazil.
  • Oliveira PPA; Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, SP 13560-970, Brazil.
  • Muñoz C; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA Remehue, Osorno 5290000, Chile.
  • Pereira LGR; Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, MG 36038-330, Brazil.
  • Gómez C; Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina, Lima 15024, Peru.
  • Ariza-Nieto C; Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research, Tibaitatá, Bogotá D.C. 250047, Colombia.
  • Ribeiro-Filho HMN; Department of Animal and Food Science, Santa Catarina State University, Lages, SC 88520-000, Brazil.
  • Castelán-Ortega OA; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, Toluca, Estado de México 5000, Mexico.
  • Rosero-Noguera JR; Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia 050034, Colombia.
  • Tieri MP; National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Rafaela, Santa Fé S2300, Argentina; Regional Faculty of Rafaela, National Technological University, Rafaela, Santa Fé S2300, Argentina.
  • Rodrigues PHM; Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP 13635-900, Brazil.
  • Marcondes MI; Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA.
  • Astigarraga L; Department of Animal Science and Pastures, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic of Uruguay, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay.
  • Abarca S; National Institute of Innovation and Agricultural Technology Transfer, Turrialba, Cartago 30508, Costa Rica.
  • Hristov AN; Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Sci Total Environ ; 825: 153982, 2022 Jun 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35202679
ABSTRACT
Successful mitigation efforts entail accurate estimation of on-farm emission and prediction models can be an alternative to current laborious and costly in vivo CH4 measurement techniques. This study aimed to (1) collate a database of individual dairy cattle CH4 emission data from studies conducted in the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region; (2) identify key variables for predicting CH4 production (g d-1) and yield [g kg-1 of dry matter intake (DMI)]; (3) develop and cross-validate these newly-developed models; and (4) compare models' predictive ability with equations currently used to support national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories. A total of 42 studies including 1327 individual dairy cattle records were collated. After removing outliers, the final database retained 34 studies and 610 animal records. Production and yield of CH4 were predicted by fitting mixed-effects models with a random effect of study. Evaluation of developed models and fourteen extant equations was assessed on all-data, confined, and grazing cows subsets. Feed intake was the most important predictor of CH4 production. Our best-developed CH4 production models outperformed Tier 2 equations from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the all-data and grazing subsets, whereas they had similar performance for confined animals. Developed CH4 production models that include milk yield can be accurate and useful when feed intake is missing. Some extant equations had similar predictive performance to our best-developed models and can be an option for predicting CH4 production from LAC dairy cows. Extant equations were not accurate in predicting CH4 yield. The use of the newly-developed models rather than extant equations based on energy conversion factors, as applied by the IPCC, can substantially improve the accuracy of GHG inventories in LAC countries.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dieta / Metano Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dieta / Metano Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article