Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in demographics, treatment and outcomes in a consecutive cohort who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation between 2005 and 2020.
De Ronde-Tillmans, M J A G; Nuis, R M; Goudzwaard, J A; Cummins, P A; Hokken, T W; Van Wiechen, M P H; Ooms, J F W; Daemen, J; Van Mieghem, N M D A; Mattace-Raso, F U S; Lenzen, M J; de Jaegere, P P T.
Afiliación
  • De Ronde-Tillmans MJAG; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Nuis RM; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Goudzwaard JA; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Cummins PA; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hokken TW; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Van Wiechen MPH; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ooms JFW; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Daemen J; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Van Mieghem NMDA; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mattace-Raso FUS; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lenzen MJ; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Jaegere PPT; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. p.dejaegere@erasmusmc.nl.
Neth Heart J ; 30(9): 411-422, 2022 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212972
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has matured to the treatment of choice for most patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We sought to identify trends in patient and procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes in all patients who underwent TAVI between 2005 and 2020.

METHODS:

A single-centre analysis was performed on 1500 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, divided into three tertiles (T) of 500 patients treated between November 2005 and December 2014 (T1), January 2015 and May 2018 (T2) and June 2018 and April 2020 (T3).

RESULTS:

Over time, mean age and gender did not change (T1 to T3 80, 80 and 79 years and 53%, 55% and 52% men, respectively), while the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score declined (T1 4.5% to T3 2.7%, p < 0.001). Use of general anaesthesia also declined over time (100%, 24% and 1% from T1 to T3) and transfemoral TAVI remained the default approach (87%, 94% and 92%). Median procedure time and contrast volume decreased significantly (186, 114 and 56 min and 120, 100 and 80 ml, respectively). Thirty-day mortality (7%, 4% and 2%), stroke (7%, 3% and 3%), need for a pacemaker (19%, 22% and 8%) and delirium (17%, 12% and 8%) improved significantly, while major bleeding/vascular complications did not change (both approximately 9%, 6% and 6%). One-year survival was 80%, 88% and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Over our 15 years' experience, patient age remained unchanged but the patient risk profile became more favourable. Simplification of the TAVI procedure occurred in parallel with major improvement in outcomes and survival. Bleeding/vascular complications and the need for pacemaker implantation remain the Achilles' heel of TAVI.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos