Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Agreement Between Alberta Infant Motor Scale Assessment and Maternal Perception of Motor Development in Full-Term Infants.
Dos Santos, Rosana Silva; de Lima Barreto, Amanda Otília Oliveira; da Silva, Maria Carolina Chapellem P Barbosa; Sá Nogueira, Hugo Ormond Vianna; Peres, Rodrigo Tosta; Ribeiro, Márcia Gonçalves; Ferreira, Halina Cidrini.
Afiliación
  • Dos Santos RS; Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • de Lima Barreto AOO; Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • da Silva MCCPB; Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Sá Nogueira HOV; Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca do Rio de Janeiro (CEFET), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Peres RT; Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca do Rio de Janeiro (CEFET), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro MG; Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Ferreira HC; Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Dev Neurorehabil ; 25(6): 417-425, 2022 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35306953
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To verify the agreement between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale assessment and maternal perception of the motor development in full-term infants.

METHODS:

This is a cross-sectional study involving 161 infants and mothers. Children were assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for motor developmental classification. Mothers completed questionnaires aiming to identify maternal profiles and impressions about their children's development. The kappa test was used to analyze the concordance between AIMS and mother perceptions.

RESULTS:

A total of 83.2% of the sample was classified as typically developing and 16.8% as suspected or delayed development. The maternal impression indicates that 77% of infants are developing typically, 19.9% perceived their infants' development as advanced, and 3.1% delayed development. There was low agreement between the mothers' perceptions and AIMS classifications (kappa = 0.153).

CONCLUSIONS:

Maternal perception of their infant's development was unsatisfactory for evaluation of motor development because their perceptions did not agree with the findings of the AIMS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desarrollo Infantil / Madres Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Infant País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Dev Neurorehabil Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PEDIATRIA / REABILITACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desarrollo Infantil / Madres Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Infant País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Dev Neurorehabil Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PEDIATRIA / REABILITACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil