Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unmet Therapeutic Needs of Non-Ambulatory Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Mixed-Method Analysis.
Schuster, Anne L R; Crossnohere, Norah L; Fischer, Ryan; Furlong, Patricia; Bridges, John F P.
Afiliación
  • Schuster ALR; Department. of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH, USA. anne.schuster@osumc.edu.
  • Crossnohere NL; Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Fischer R; Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Furlong P; Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Bridges JFP; Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 56(4): 572-586, 2022 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35325439
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Duchenne muscular dystrophy has been a launching pad for patient-focused drug development (PFDD). Yet, PFDD efforts have largely neglected non-ambulatory patients. To support PFDD efforts in this population, we primarily sought to understand the needs of non-ambulatory Duchenne patients and, secondarily, to examine these needs in the context of the PUL-PROM-a validated patient-reported outcome measure of upper limb functioning.

METHODS:

Non-ambulatory Duchenne patients or their caregivers from eight countries answered open-ended survey questions about patients' needs related to their most significant symptoms and important benefits of new treatments. The PUL-PROM was used to evaluate patients' upper limb functioning and was compared to data collected on non-ambulatory stage and quality of life. We thematically analyzed open-ended data, descriptively analyzed close-ended data, and compared themes by non-ambulatory stage.

RESULTS:

The study included 275 participants. Mean patient age was 24. Most patients were early-stage non-ambulatory (67%). Thematic analysis identified three congruent themes between significant symptoms and important benefits of new treatments muscle functioning, especially upper limb function; body system functioning; and quality of life. Muscle functioning and body system functioning were endorsed more frequently in responses from early- and late-stage patients, respectively. Mean PUL-PROM total score was 22 with higher scores in early-stage patients (p ≤ 0.001). Upper limb function positively correlated with quality of life (r = 0.42, p ≤ 0.001).

DISCUSSION:

Non-ambulatory Duchenne patients want new treatments that improve upper limb functioning and body system functioning, and not exclusively regaining ambulation. The PUL-PROM can be used as a patient-centric measure that accounts for the needs of later-stage Duchenne patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ther Innov Regul Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ther Innov Regul Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos