Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability and benefits of single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction (SEMAR) in the different orthopedic hardware for the hip.
Chen, Yu-Hua; Lu, Chia-Hsin; Chen, Yu-Jen; Chen, Han-Sheng; Hsieh, Tsyh-Jyi.
Afiliación
  • Chen YH; Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Lu CH; Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chen YJ; Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chen HS; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Hsieh TJ; Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Skeletal Radiol ; 51(9): 1853-1863, 2022 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35347404
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the performance and reliability of the single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with different orthopedic hardware at the hips. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 153 patients with hip instrumentation who had undergone CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D and SEMAR algorithms between February 2015 and October 2019 were included retrospectively. Patients were divided into 5 groups by the hardware type. Two readers with 21 and 13 years of experience blindly reviewed all image sets and graded the extent of artifacts and imaging quality using 5-point scales. To evaluate reliability, the mean densities and image noises were measured at the urinary bladder, veins, and fat in images with artifacts and the reference images.

RESULTS:

No significant differences were found in the mean densities of the urinary bladder, veins, and fat between the SEMAR images with artifacts (7.57 ± 9.49, 40.29 ± 23.07, 86.78 ± 38.34) and the reference images (7.77 ± 6.2, 40.27 ± 8.66, 89.10 ± 20.70) (P = .860, .994, .392). Image noises of the urinary bladder in the SEMAR images with artifacts (14.25 ± 4.50) and the SEMAR reference images (9.69 ± 1.29) were significantly higher than those in the AIDR 3D reference images (9.11 ± 1.12) (P < .001; P < .001). All AIDR 3D images were non-diagnostic (overall quality ≤ 3) and less than a quarter of the SEMAR images were non-diagnostic (16.7-23.7%), mainly in patients with prostheses [reader 1 91.7% (22/24); reader 2 92.6% (25/27)].

CONCLUSION:

The SEMAR algorithm significantly reduces metal artifacts in CT images, more in patients with internal fixations than in patients with prostheses, and provides reliable attenuation of soft tissues.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador / Artefactos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador / Artefactos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán