A pilot study to troubleshoot quality control metrics when assessing circulating miRNA expression data reproducibility across study sites.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the growing interest in using microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers of early disease, establishment of robust protocols and platforms for miRNA quantification in biological fluids is critical. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this multi-center pilot study was to evaluate the reproducibility of NanoString nCounter™ technology when analyzing the abundance of miRNAs in plasma and cystic fluid from patients with pancreatic lesions. METHODS: Using sample triplicates analyzed across three study sites, we assessed potential sources of variability (RNA isolation, sample processing/ligation, hybridization, and lot-to-lot variability) that may contribute to suboptimal reproducibility of miRNA abundance when using nCounter™, and evaluated expression of positive and negative controls, housekeeping genes, spike-in genes, and miRNAs. RESULTS: Positive controls showed a high correlation across samples from each site (median correlation coefficient, r> 0.9). Most negative control probes had expression levels below background. Housekeeping and spike-in genes each showed a similar distribution of expression and comparable pairwise correlation coefficients of replicate samples across sites. A total of 804 miRNAs showed a similar distribution of pairwise correlation coefficients between replicate samples (p= 0.93). After normalization and selecting miRNAs with expression levels above zero in 80% of samples, 55 miRNAs were identified; heatmap and principal component analysis revealed similar expression patterns and clustering in replicate samples. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this pilot investigation suggest the nCounter platform can yield reproducible results across study sites. This study underscores the importance of implementing quality control procedures when designing multi-center evaluations of miRNA abundance.